x Close
  • International Herald Tribune: Breathless in Paris

    One of the hardest things about moving to Paris is doing without The New York Times every morning. As well-designed as the online version is, it doesn't compare with the printed edition. In fact, I find the difference between the two experiences surprisingly disturbing. The digital paper, updated on a near-constant basis, keeps scores on the latest developments, transforming reading the news into a spectator's sport. The fiber-based original, in contrast, lets you contend with the information mano-a-mano, hand-to-hand, one rustling page at a time.

    Views page in the new International Herald Tribune

    The redesigned opinion pages of the International Herald Tribune. (photo: Véronique Vienne)

    But things are perking up. Since March 30, a pretty good facsimile of the Op-Ed page is now available at my local City of Light newsstand. As luck would have it, the editors of my favorite newspaper have taken over the International Herald Tribune, the famous American newspaper edited in Paris since 1887, and are turning it into the “global New York Times.” For a steep 2.50 euros—about 3.50 dollars—I can now buy a likeness of the Gray Lady from a sidewalk vendor on the Avenue de l'Opéra, right across the street from one of the 37 Starbucks now established in the French capital. You can't stop progress. All I now need is for the Apple Store to open in the upscale shopping mall that's under the Louvre museum, and I can pretend that I live in Manhattan.

    At first glance, this latest incarnation of the Tribune looks the same as the Times. The typographical ingredients are familiar indeed: same chiseled Fraktur logo, same beautifully crafted Cheltenham display faces, same reader-friendly Imperial text type, same elegantly letter-spaced all-caps subheads, same handsome upper and lower case headlines, same tall and lithe columns—yet this identical twin feels totally different from its New York sibling. I would like to believe that the two papers are the same, but truth be told, I am disappointed. The new Tribune format feels too loose. For reasons having to do with the norms of European and Asian presses on which the IHT is printed, the paper is taller and wider than the NYT, its larger size an impediment when it comes to creating synergy between the various graphic components on the page. Imagine Times Square recreated on a big lot in Las Vegas, and you've got how it feels to open the new International Herald Tribune.

     

    The new IHT website and front page

    IHT.com is now global.nytimes.com and the print edition looks more like the Times, too. (photo: Véronique Vienne)

    Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg in Breathless

    Jean Seberg (at right) sells the Tribune in the 1960 film Breathless.

    This situation is doubly frustrating for the expat I am. I did not dislike the old Tribune, in spite of its dowdy format (heavy Poynter headlines and text, tight leading, blocky layouts). Though not smartly designed, it had a cult status here, in part because of the movie Breathless (A bout de souffle), in which boyish-looking Jean Seberg was seen strutting down the Champs-Elysées sporting a shirt embroidered with the logo of the Herald Tribune. Today, newspapers could not buy this type of product placement if they tried. So haunting was this 1960 filmic moment, courtesy of Jean-Luc Godard, that it had become an integral part of the image of the newspaper. For countless English-speaking readers worldwide, 250,000 of them, myself included, the name of the publication conjured up the memory of days gone by when American culture was synonymous with savvy, sophistication and style.

    Not surprisingly, when some top New York Times editors suggested the old Tribune be terminated as such and be replaced by a spiffy international edition of the Times (the Manhattan paper assumed full ownership of the Paris daily in 2007), marketing studies revealed that the brand equity of the Tribune was too valuable to be discarded. Prominently displayed on newsstands in 180 countries, this 120-year-old media institution is a highly respected product. So, somewhat reluctantly, decision makers at the New York Times Company had elected to transform the IHT without changing its title, stipulating nonetheless that the new version had to reflect as much as possible the journalistic principles and the “seriousness” of the Times editorial direction.

    In charge of masterminding this design operation was Tom Bodkin, associate editor and design director of the Times since 1987. With the help of art director Kelly Doe, Bodkin systematically itemized the visual components that contribute to creating a “perception of seriousness.” In order to explain to the Paris staff how to replicate the NYT format successfully, they had to draw a long list of directives. To begin with, no extrabold headlines! The typographical approach must be neutral, the text easy to read, with titles and subtitles that steer clear of sensationalism. The size of the letters should not be used to emphasize the importance of the news. More specific recommendations included narrow columns, tightly letter-spaced lines, informational headings and subheadings, graphic icons only whenever helpful, a limited number of typefaces, and, of course, a grid system promoting clarity. Bodkin and Doe made one last stipulation: under no circumstance should text or headlines be printed in color! This deliberate blandness, considered a quality at the NYT where impartiality is paramount, looked a little meek when transplanted abroad, in a different cultural context. Compared with the majority of European newspapers, the pages of the IHT today feel rather pale.

     

    Comparing nameplate for the IHT, before and after

    The International Herald Tribune's nameplate section before (top half) and after the redesign (prototype above).

    Betting on “seriousness” was a calculated risk The New York Times was willing to take in response to the challenge of free dailies and online newspapers. Editors were confident that IHT readers would respond positively and embrace the more structured format as more informative, and thus more entertaining. They did not think that their international audiences would be intimidated by the succinctly presented wealth of information, nor would they be put off by the “Anglo-Saxon” exactness of the more demanding Bodkin template. What the NYT editors did not measure, though, is the void the old Tribune would leave. Ah! To lean on the counter of a bistro, order a cup of Java, and, sidestepping the gossipy local press, open the fusty Herald Tribune to survey the latest dispatches from news services worldwide. Its uncool design was endearing. Cosmopolite yet at the same time foreign—conservative but oddly opinionated (sometimes disconcertingly so, for European readers)—the paper Jean Seberg was selling on the Champs-Elysées used to deliver a form of journalistic escapism.

    Escapism is still what I seek when digging 2.50 euros from my bag to purchase a little piece of home. I fold the newspaper under my arm (making sure that its name is showing) and stroll leisurely down the avenue to a nearby café. I then sit down and unfurl my prize possession. Sure, the Tribune doesn't give me the same sense of compactness and compression I came to associate with good reportages. But the intelligence of its visual vocabulary is utterly compelling, once I dig into it. As with The New York Times, I find myself eager to engage with it, eager to decipher its codes, eager to question its choices of images, eager to interact with its visual prompts. “Seriousness” is not solely about the way the news, opinions and commentaries are treated on paper, it is also about the way the readers are treated as they earnestly try to make sense of the complex headlines of the day.

    Véronique Vienne's more detailed analysis of the International Herald Tribune redesign appears in the April issue ofétapesmagazine (in French). 

    Recommend No one has recommended this yet
    AIGA encourages thoughtful, responsible discourse. Please add comments judiciously, and refrain from maligning any individual, institution or body of work. Read our policy on commenting.