What is AIGA’s position on spec work? And how are ethical standards determined?
The web's impact on traditional business practices and spec
work—speculative work done prior to engagement with a client in
anticipation of being paid—recently reinvigorated discussions of
ethics and professional standards for the design industry. In
addition to prompting AIGA to re-examine its own position on spec
work, through a task force led by members of the national board of
directors, these conversations also raised the question of who
determines an ethical standard.
AIGA believes that a professional association should not be a
monolithic authority releasing edicts for all to observe. Rather,
the ethics of a profession should emerge from its members,
reflecting the tacit agreement of a profession on behavior that is
deemed appropriate, respectful and honorable. An association may
articulate the implicit standards of integrity, but it does not set
them. And as social, professional and business conditions change,
it is important to restate positions so they are relevant to the
context in which they will be applied—in this case, AIGA's position on spec
work.
Changes in context that require a refinement of AIGA's
approach
The internet has radically changed the means of soliciting and
offering design, democratizing participation in creative endeavors
paid and free, commissioned and speculative. This warrants a change
in the approach AIGA takes toward spec work, even while holding
firm to the core belief that spec work embodies inherent risks.
In a world where visual communication is increasingly prevalent,
necessary and demanding, the profession's role should not be to
reduce the pursuit of visual creativity by the masses. AIGA, on
behalf of the design profession, is committed to improving the
visual literacy of business, government and society, and to help
them understand the true value of design well executed. The design
profession should not position itself against the popular pursuit
of creative endeavors. But design is not merely a form of creative
expression, and AIGA must also promote the designer's ability to
solve problems, think strategically and make the intangible
tangible.
AIGA's revised position on spec work
AIGA acknowledges that spec work has long been practiced,
continues to occur and may indeed be increasing, particularly as
the internet alters and augments solicitation, bidding, marketing
and distribution practices. The AIGA board, in consultation with a
number of interested members, recently revisited AIGA's
long-standing policy against spec work in the context of changing
dynamics in the marketplace.
As an institution that is a reflection of its membership, AIGA
encourages designers to exercise their individual decision-making
rights to engage in design as they see fit. AIGA's role is to
extend an understanding of the risks associated with certain
practices—risks to the individual designer, the client and the
profession as a whole.
AIGA's official position on spec work
AIGA, the professional association for design,
believes that professional designers should be compensated fairly
for the value of their work and should negotiate the ownership or
use rights of their intellectual and creative property through an
engagement with clients.
AIGA acknowledges that speculative work occurs among clients and
designers. Instead of working speculatively, AIGA strongly
encourages designers to enter into projects with full engagement to
continue to show the value of their creative endeavor. Designers
and clients should be aware of all potential risks before entering
into speculative work.
AIGA is committed to informing designers, students, educators,
clients and the general public on the risks of compromising the
design process through information, materials and services that can
help in forging a healthy working relationship between designers
and their clients.
AIGA maintains that speculative work can compromise the benefits
of effective design for both clients and designers. A designer
fully engaged in a client's challenges is as necessary to an
effective solution as it is fair in terms of compensating creative
and professional efforts. With the current trends and practices of
open source creative development and online bidding for work, the
designer and client will engage as they see fit, although they
should assume responsibility for risks involved in spec work should
they choose that course.
It is the duty of AIGA to continue to inform the public,
business and the design community of the potential risks of
spec work, including implications for the quality of the
outcome, intellectual property rights and economic fairness. In the
long run, AIGA is committed to encouraging creative expression and
enhancing visual literacy for all. It is our hope and belief that
only through education will the understanding and appreciation of
professional design be extended and perpetuated.
About the Author: Richard Grefé is the executive director of AIGA, the professional association for design. While guiding all of AIGA’s activities, his most significant contributions are in strategy, formulating new initiatives to enhance the competitive success of designers
and advocating the value of design to business, government and the public.