Everyone who cares about language has a
list of personal offenses. Among mine are irregardless for regardless,
lay for lie, like for as, criteria
for criterion, less for fewer, plus words or
phrases that are superfluous because we already have adequate ways of
saying the same thing. Expertness, for example, was always a
perfectly good expression. Expertise adds nothing more but a
suffix with pretentious roots. At this point in time is no
improvement on now, but sounds more precise and scholarly;
perhaps it originally entered the language as a way of distinguishing
time from space.
Between you and I makes me cringe, suspecting that the speaker
learned (or thought she learned) from a grade school English teacher
that I is right and me wrong, and has ever since felt
secure only by avoiding me whenever possible.
Rules are not really made to be broken; however, they are designed to
be breakable. Many of us have our favorite violations. Steve Heller,
the dean of design writers, refuses to stop using irregardless,
even though he knows there is no such word, “because I like the irrrrrr
sound.” As for me, I happily give poetry a pass. One of my favorite
hymns is the so-called “white spiritual” “I
Wonder as I Wander,” with lyrics that ask plaintively:
Why did the Lord Jesus come down for to dieFor poor orn’ry sinners like you and like I?
That doesn’t make me cringe, but it would if corrected. The solecism,
forced by rhyme, is beautiful there. Allegiance to grammar would ruin
it. So I have to remind myself not only that rules can be broken, but
that language, being alive, changes. But while we know that language
changes, we don’t always know when it’s happening. An exception—a change
occurring before our very ears—is the tendency to use a singular verb
in a contraction, even when the noun is plural.
“There’s three preferred typefaces.” That’s not a genuine quote,
because I don’t know that anyone has said it. But if someone had, it
wouldn’t have bothered us much. On the other hand, people have said:
“There’s three reporters on every story”; “There’s a great many things
for Obama to consider”; “There’s several problems with nuclear energy”;
“There’s two bills on the table”; “There’s a few ways of looking at
this”; “There’s too many things going on right now.”
That doesn’t trouble us either, and I guarantee you’ll hear the
locution today if you listen to the radio, watch TV, attend a meeting,
or talk to a neighbor. The speakers you will hear it from are not
illiterate. They would never say, “There is too many things going on.”
But verbs in those ungrammatical examples are all contractions, making
the breach of grammar acceptable. Why? Maybe because, when speaking, it
is easy to forget how a sentence began. I think it more likely, though,
that it represents the present tendency to relax formal standards in
language, whether written or spoken.
Should any of this concern designers? At first it may not seem so.
But, after all, graphic designers devised standards manuals to keep
corporations from violating the structure created for them. Long before
that, usage manuals for writers were created for somewhat comparable
reasons. Because language changes, the manuals do too, becoming updated
almost as soon as they are printed, raising the question of why they
should be printed at all. (They may not be for much longer.)
The best-known and most popular contemporary usage manual is The
Elements of Style, E. B. White’s revision of the textbook written by
his college English professor William Strunk. The book’s popularity
stems from White’s highly reasoned updating and his loving description
of encounters with the book and author. I love reading it, and when
asked by students to recommend a manual, I encourage them to buy
Strunk and White’s book in the 2007
edition enhanced by Maira Kalman’s splendid, wayward art, because it
is a book they will love and should own. But I suggest that they use
whatever manual is used by the school they attend or the company they
work for, which is likely to be either the manual of the University
of Chicago or The
New York Times, and to turn to the internet for anything more
In a talk to SVA students recently, Michael
Bierut pointed out that design has moved from an exclusive concern
with the appearance of type on a page, to participation in content.
Certainly the design community is richly loaded with designers whose
writing matches the standard of their graphics—Bierut himself, Milton
Glaser, Bill Drenttel, Paula Scher, Maira Kalman, Ellen Lupton, Abbot
Miller, Lorraine Wild, Brad Holland, many others.
While standards are less rigid than they once were, even in an age of
texting and tweeting they are still essential to designers of
communication. Because words express content, certain principles of
construction are necessary to frame their delivery. At the very least we
need an armature to support ideas until they are stable enough to make
sense on their own. Even if it must in the end be discarded. Like the
goldsmith’s wax, rules may not just be broken, but lost.
Otherwise we’re condemned to a world of poor orn’ry sinners like
you and like me.
Ralph Caplan is the author of Cracking the Whip: Essays on Design
and Its Side Effects and By Design. Caplan is the former editor of
I.D. magazine, and has been a columnist for both I.D. and Print. He lectures widely, teaches in the graduate Design Criticism program at the School of Visual Arts, was awarded the 2010 “Design Mind” National Design Award by the Cooper-Hewitt
and is the recipient of the
2011 AIGA Medal.
What language are you? Ralph Caplan considers how languages—within design disciplines and among cultural groups—can unite and divide.
Section: Inspiration -
diversity, international, Voice
When it comes time for in-house designers to connect with internal clients, they rarely speak the same language. Taute offers tips to improve communication.
Section: Tools and Resources -
in-house design, INitiative
The way we read is constantly changing, and so is the way we write. Curtis articulates why this is a good thing.
Section: Inspiration -
user research, professional development, personal essay, Voice
Should designers be taught writing the same way as everyone else? Lupton looks at current teaching methods to help the visual become verbal too.
Students don’t like to write, you say? Maybe it’s the assignments that are the problem. Barringer proposes 21 ways to inspire student writing.
Section: Inspiration -
Voice, design educators, students
Good design has the ability to define a great product, service or cause. AIGA member Sara N.A. Suttle shares some thoughts on why skimping on design is never, ever a good idea.
Section: Why Design
Commercial Type Website
Video: Closing remarks from Debbie Millman
Taking highfalutin to new levels, classy mezcal #packaging elevates boozy brunch https://t.co/raBcM7qrXI @SeriesNemo https://t.co/UBnAvL9lu7
3 hours ago
How Rainbow Flag's Gilbert Baker hit @romanmars; 5 flag design musts ?? onDesign:
https://t.co/fghpqJUjSx #gaypride https://t.co/8JCtOieqYW
"I find it amazing people can be shocked by a black triangle" —@malikafavre on sexy alphabets + the power of design: https://t.co/S4SdjeXqAu
8 hours ago
Upstate New York
AIGA AZ 2016 Town Hall Meeting survey
June 18, 2016
Show your love Arizona with a poster
June 17, 2016