Local Lingo
Article by
Alice TwemlowApril 7, 2004.
Contemporary culture, and specifically contemporary design culture,
endorses globalness. The myth is that with a laptop and wifi
connection, a Hip Hotels guidebook, and some Mandarina Duck
luggage, your design practice can be as peripatetic as you are. And
to, an extent, it's true. New ideas do tend to flow in the interim
zones of airport lounges and during long-haul flights that involve
two ethereal sunrises. Furthermore, connecting to the concerns of
people beyond one's immediate working environment is essential to
the breadth of thinking that distinguishes worldly design. And,
almost without exception these days, design firms find a way to lay
claim to their international status. Work in the Pompidou Center as
well as the Victoria & Albert Museum? Check. Offices in
multiple time zones and clocks tuned to those time zones hanging
over the reception desks? Check. A website that makes liberal use
of the phrases “internationally recognized” and “global
reputation,” and lists several multinational corporations on its
client roster? Cross check.
In the context of this globally oriented mindset, does locality
have any meaning? When designers can be anywhere is it still
possible to be from somewhere?
And if so, in what ways does a locale permeate one's work? Can you
tell a poster or a Flash animation was made in Auckland rather than
Philadelphia? Can you read a piece of design as you would a
building that can clearly reflect the climate, materials and
physical constraints of a particular region? Or, is geographical
delimitation meaningless in a design community that has taken the
universalizing principles of International Typography to their
logical extreme?
“Keeping up with your roots and local influences is a hard thing
today and so we tend to get caught in the global mainstream,” says
Dimitri Jeurissen, partner of Base, a design studio with offices in
Brussels, Barcelona and New York. Jeurissen who is Belgian and
lives in Brooklyn, embodies design's tense relationship with
globalness. On the one hand globalness is part of Base's lifeblood:
Jeurissen pushes for seamless interchange between the output of the
three studios—“Something I want to encourage is that, at the end of
a job, you don't know who did it, because there's been input from
everyone”—the references he collects on cultural tourism sprees
feed his work; and he is “on the telephone or i-chat or email every
day concerning jobs in different parts of Europe.” Jeurissen's
pursuit of the global is not unequivocal, however. The Base website
jokes that the company plans “to open a new studio somewhere in the
world every 3 minutes just like McDonalds.” Jeurissen thinks it's
boring that “there's a certain type of shop or hotel in which you
will not know what city you are in,” and he's developing the
identity for a restaurant that his friends are opening down the
road from him in Brooklyn.
Instead of being forced to choose between a celebratory or a
diffident stance toward globalness, Base has managed to combine the
two approaches: “If a client wants to make a brand and has the
power to develop it globally, then that's one strategy, but we
always try to find twists that are local within that strategy.” One
of Base's clients is Puma (fig. 3, fig. 4), the German-originated
but now-global sportswear brand. According to Jeurissen, “They are
working more locally to develop smaller sub developments within the
brand. They are not doing it the Nike way. They want to find
alternatives to heavy corporate and global branding, but they are
doing it all over the world.”
This strategy approximates to a larger cultural fascination with a
new kind of localness—ultra-particular and specific in its
reference base but ultimately dislocated from actual place. The
irony is that the more we are aware of everything that's happening
everywhere the more we want to connect with something, somewhere.
Base provides the creative direction for a magazine called
BEople (fig. 1, fig. 2), for example, which is about
Belgian culture and, as such, would appear to have defined its
market geographically. “Our starting point was very local,” recalls
Jeurissen, “but soon we were working on this subject with an
international team of collaborators. Then, despite its very local
cultural interest, you have people buying it in New York and
Tokyo.” BEople is just one instance of this trend in which
design plays a key role. Re-Magazine created by the Dutch
designer Jop van Bennekom is another. Despite the specificity and
locality of its content—whole issues are devoted to the dietary
habits of Marcel, a 44-year old sales representative from Wavrin, a
village on the outskirts of Lille, or Claudia, the 6 foot 5-tall
woman from Berlin—its readership is defined not by place but by a
shared mindset that exists in Sydney just as easily as
Zurich.
Our potential for connectedness at a trans-national level, through
conferences, competitions, festivals, exhibitions, visiting
professorships, blogs, online and print publications, ftp sites,
and text messaging, can be all-consuming and disorienting. In an
effort to find focus and, ultimately, identity, readers of
publications such as BEople or Re are seeking
resonances that are as local as possible, even if those localities
are on the other side of the world.