x Close
  • Top 10 election design guidelines

    Ballots, voter information and polling place materials can be made clearer, more effective, and easier for citizens to use with attention to a few design recommendations. These tips are based on design practice and usability testing with election materials. The election experience will be improved whether they are implemented one at a time or all at once.

    AIGA Design for Democracy’s top 10 election design guidelines are derived from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission report Effective Designs for the Administration of Federal Elections. Complete guidelines, editable samples, and information on connecting with professional designers is at designfordemocracy.org. State or local laws that prescribe font sizes, typefaces or use of capital letters may prevent some elections officials from fully implementing these guidelines. Design for Democracy can support elections officials in requesting law changes that would enable full implementation.

    1. Use lowercase letters

    Lowercase letters are more legible than ALL CAPITAL LETTERS because they are easier to recognize.

    2. Avoid centered type

    Left-aligned type is more legible than centered type, which forces the eye to stop reading in order to find the start of the next line.

    3. Use big enough type

    “Fine print” is hard to read and may intimidate or alienate voters. Use minimum type sizes: 12-point for optical scan; 25-point for touchscreens. (Following this principle for optical scan ballots may impact printing costs but will be a worthwhile investment in election accuracy.)

    4. Pick one sans-serif font

    Avoid introducing new fonts, which require the eye to stop reading and adjust. Sans-serif fonts with clean strokes (Arial, Helvetica, Univers, Verdana) are recommended for screen and for the quantity and variation of text found on paper ballots. For dual-language materials, use bold text for the primary language, regular text for the secondary language.

    5. Support process and navigation

    For optical-scan ballots, offer comprehensive instructions and page numbering. For touchscreen ballots, offer language and mode options, continuous access to instructions, consistent and flexible navigation and clear feedback about selections. Post notable wayfinding and instructional materials in and around the polling place.

    6. Use clear, simple language

    State instructions and options as simply as possible. Summarize referenda in simple language alongside required formats. Do not include more than two languages on any one material.

    7. Use accurate instructional illustrations

    Visual instructions help low-literacy and general-population voters. Photo images, which are difficult to shoot and reproduce well, are not recommended. Illustrations must be accurate in their details to avoid misleading voters.

    8. Use informational icons (only)

    Avoid political party icons. Icons that call attention to key information and support navigation are recommended in limited use.

    9. Use contrast and color functionally

    Use color and shading consistently: on optical scan ballots, to differentiate instructions from contents and contests from each other; and on touchscreen ballots, to support navigation, call special attention and provide user feedback. Color cannot be relied on as the only way to communicate important information.

    10. Decide what's most important

    Page and screen layout and text sizes should support information hierarchy. For instance, the ballot title should be more prominent than any one contest, a contest header should be more prominent than its candidates' names and a candidate's name should be bolder than his/her party affiliation. Candidates' names and options should be presented with equal importance.

    Note: Design for Democracy, a strategic initiative of AIGA, the professional association for design, has worked on election design reform since 2000 and developed both the full EAC report and this list of guidelines. Guidelines are based on best practices in communication design, consultation with election officials nationwide, and extensive voter testing.

    Recommend No one has recommended this yet