Fat Fight: Visual Communication Addressing Obesity
Article by
Jason TselentisApril 23, 2004.
The public must be in denial or ill informed about personal
nutrition and health because our nation is witnessing an explosion.
With 64% of the population diagnosed as overweight/obese, deaths
related to diet or physical activity now close in on those caused
by smoking cigarettes. Children ages 8-13 face health problems such
as type 2 diabetes that were previously experienced by only adults.
Is it what we're eating? Is it how much we're eating? Do we
exercise enough? Many questions surround the problem, and we need
to communicate solutions.
A lot of emphasis has been placed on food itself with fast foods
and junk foods the primary targets. Recently, sodas have been
scrutinized and even banned from school cafeterias. That's a good
place to start. We must concern ourselves with children, who
represent the future. When they arrive at home, it's not schoolwork
they jump in front of, it's the television. Children over the age
of 8 watch over 4.5 hours of television per day and nearly 90% of
the advertisements they watch are for junk food. They're on the
couch for afternoon cartoons. They're snacking. They're looking at
even more options to snack on, cookies, sodas, “sport drinks”, and
hamburgers flood their vision. Those brands imprint fun and
exciting messages that stimulate choosing those foods in lieu of
healthy ones. They're sensitized to sugary cereals and high calorie
sweets that become substitutes for meals or worse, snacks in
addition to their daily caloric intake. Fruits and vegetables seem
boring and uncool in comparison. Brand loyalty comes before
nutrition: “Coke is cooler than Pepsi. McDonald's tastes way better
than Burger King does. I love Krispy Kreme.” How can anything
compete on that level in order to sell the idea that healthy eating
habits are awesome? The National Cancer Society spends $1mil on its
5-A-Day fruit and vegetable campaign compared to M&M's $80mil.
Got Milk spends $130mil compared to Coca-Cola's $569mil. It's no
wonder we don't eat enough of the right things; the most heavily
advertised foods are consumed the most.
The colors, characters, and entertainment that compose a brand like
McDonald's, aim precisely at young, uniformed consumers who become
brand conscious early. Most children recognize the golden arches
before they can even speak. Ad executives target their messages to
the tweens-the consumer group made of children before they become
teenagers, also known as preteens. The results led McDonald's to
buy large spots of time on Saturday mornings, now known as the
Saturday a.m. buy. In the 90s, parts of Canada and Australia
reduced the amount of promotional time used by junk foods. Now it
seems the U.S. will follow. But until Ronald McDonald disappears into
the twilight zone, children will be watching campaigns like the
Center for Disease Control's “what's your verb?” that encourage
exercise, sports, and activity to balance their health. Already,
the ads can be seen in comic books and magazines frequented by
children ages 6-12. Television spots appear here and there during
the Saturday a.m. buy, but are no where as prevalent as fast foods.
In 2003, the CDC spent nearly $60 million on advertising moguls
Saatchi & Saatchi, who will revise the entire campaign in 2004
because of complaints that it failed to deliver a concrete message.
A similar campaign is underway by the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services called “Small Steps.” Their ads use humor and
motivation as messaging devices, getting out the word that you can
take small steps to be healthy. Taking the stairs will help lose
those love handles, more fruits and vegetables rid you of the
double chin. The television spots are quite entertaining.
Long before the U.S. embarked on these public service campaigns, a
research experiment took place in Montreal, where a middle-class
neighborhood was observed after an 8-week period of informing them
on proper diet and exercise. The control group did not receive any
campaign material. The intervention group received one pamphlet per
week. After the 8-weeks of pamphlets, the researchers noted a
reduced intake of high fat and junk food, with a better overall
diet and increase in exercise for the intervention group. The
control group had shown no changes in eating habits and gained an
average of 1 kilogram (approx. 2 pounds). It seems that information
design has power.
According to David Satcher, the former U.S. Surgeon General, “Left
unabated, obesity will overcome smoking as the number one cause of
preventable death.” So much of the media is looking to set the
blame for these matters. So what can we do? Graphic designers and
advertisers have great power, capable influencing behavior. With
the epidemic overcoming our nation, we have a responsibility to not
merely talk about the problem. Let's educate the public about ways
they can help themselves. Public service campaigns are one way to
start, but a lot more can be done. Designers are fond of donating
their time and energy for worthy causes like arts organizations,
AIDS research, or Cancer fundraising. Doesn't something like the
current epidemic facing our nation deserve equal attention? Maybe
visual communication can somehow affect behavior, or better yet,
make healthy choices easier for us to make.