Design Patois
It's sometimes embarrassing the way that designers prostrate
themselves—and the English language—in their promotional material
describing in words what they do, as though their designs alone
aren't enough to tell the story. It may be true that some clients
(or prospective clients) don't have a good grasp of what design is,
but most have eyes and can intuit. During the nascent period of
graphic design (somewhere around the mid-1920s) all that a
commercial artist advertising in one of the many promotional
annuals had to say was "Jeanne Doe, calligraphy, layout,
illustration," and the point was made (in part because the services
were being bought by agencies or art directors, not directly by
clients). Today, with non-design clients being more active in the
hiring process, something called design philosophy has become the
basis of a new patois. Philosophy is not pejorative, but when it
turns to sophistry—beware!
When there is a gap between one's real and
one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long
words and exhausted idioms, like cuttlefish squirting out ink.
—George Orwell.
For at least the past decade designers have tried to position
themselves as legitimate professionals. Inherent in this quest is
an attempt to squelch the myth that visual people are ostensibly
illiterate. Where the myth started is anyone's guess. After all,
the first, what one might call, literate people—those who developed
the earliest codified languages—were image makers. The first
alphabets were comprised of images. Early scripture was illuminated
by scribes who made pictures as well as words. The first typefaces
were designed by artists. The first books were designed by
artist/writers. So, traditionally, designers have been a very
literate people. Then, where and when did the distinction begin?
Maybe it came with the onset of commercial printing, when publicity
was churned out, not designed—when its makers began providing
service, not art. Not all commercial printers or commercial artists
were enemies of the word, yet the impact of those who were has had
a detrimental effect, ultimately leading in the early 20th century
to the schism between copywriters and designers.
During the 1950s these distinctions in the advertising world
started to blur, but graphic designers were still suffering from
the effects of negative stereotypes. Ever since graphic designers
began adding terms like "marketing" and "communications" to their
billheads, the accepted notion that having a codified philosophy
would undo those negative stereotypes has resulted in design firms
issuing promotional materials replete with weighty (and sometimes
dramatic) mission statements that read either like legal briefs or
epic poems, like this one:
Communications: Visual plays
leading to emotional involvement.
Communications: Creativity at levels that make the
experience.
Communications: Materials that desire to be collected for
keeps.
Communications: Turn the target. Flip the crowd.
Communications: Translate the message into action to your
advantage.
Communications: Manage the trains of thought and the rest will come
to you for yours.
Without any disrespect intended, is what you just read substance
or hype? Did it describe or confuse? Think about the selling (flap
or ad) copy on a book or the liner notes on a record. In both cases
the best of these titillate, if not illuminate. What does this copy
tell us? Visual plays? A rather strained metaphor.
Emotional involvement? A lot to hope for from a piece of
paper. Collected for keeps? Hold on! Even the best publicity
has a limited shelf life. Manage the trains of thought? Hey,
did anyone copy-read this?
If language be not in accordance with the truth
of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success. —Confucius
As hyperbolic as it is, the "visual plays" copy is at least
somewhat creative compared to the conventional fare. Indeed, with
few welcome exceptions when designers, especially firms, extol
their own virtues, the results are dry, platitudinous and
repetitive, with buzzwords reminiscent of police accounts like the
ones one hears uttered on the TV news by rookie cops: "The perp, a
Caucasian, white female, was apprehended and subdued by two
pursuing, uniformed officers, while proceeding to gain unlawful
access to the abode of the victim…"
To a teacher of languages there comes a time
when the world is but a place of many words and man appears a mere
talking animal not more wonderful than a parrot. —Joseph Conrad
Like cadets parroting the phrases in Jargon 101 at any police
academy, most designers learn—Lord knows from where—that to gain
respect in the outside world it is imperative to use officious
language they would never apply in everyday usage. No school,
however, exists to teach this stuff—yet, take virtually any
promotional brochure for a design firm, scratch the surface, and
you will find variations of the following platitudes:
- Design is a tool for achieving specific results. Being
responsive, we begin each project by learning exactly what results
our client expects. This then becomes our communications
goal.
- Establishing an appropriate, positive emphasis is the key.
This, in conjunction with good graphic design, is our special
skill.
- Our work exhibits a great diversity of styles and imagery.
In an era of design specialists, we invariably believe that as
varied as the messages are, so should the means of conveying
them.
These statements by three very different design firms are not
inherently disingenuous, but when viewed as representative of most
promo copy they are formulaic. Should all selling copy sound alike?
Imagine what the prospective client who gets pitched by many
designers must think after reading the same phrases and sentiments
over and over. Probably he or she must think that they've all read
the same copy of How To Succeed In Business Without Really
Trying, or at least have hired the same PR firm. To further the
point that despite the remarkable diversity among design firms
today, their hype comes from the same copy of Bartlett's
Familiar Design Firm Promotions.
The following phrases have been culled from a variety of
sources. In fact, virtually no two of the design firms represented
by these unattributed statements do the same kind of work. For
purposes of clarity they are categorized according to the six major
thematic categories.
1. Happiness Is a Warm Client
- The process begins with analysis, immersion into the
client's situation in order to define the true problem.
- Our primary concern is with our client's success in their
business.
- The basic need of most clients who come to us is to fulfill
a business function.
- Our primary concern is to solve the client's communications
objective.
- Our goal is to meet our clients' visual communications needs
by applying an approach based on discipline, appropriateness and
ambiguity. [huh?]
- We carefully analyze our client's needs, and if necessary,
reinterpret them in a more profound way than the client can
do.
- A key element to our approach is that we uniquely tailor
each project to a particular client's needs.
- We will not begin a project without a clear understanding of
the spoken and unspoken client needs.
- Today, we bring to our clients a rich, ever-expanding base
of knowledge and experience.
- Our main concern is understanding and working closely with
our clients to carefully think through and define the problem at
hand.
- No matter how well we prepare ourselves with information,
the client's knowledge far exceeds ours.
2. Style? We Don't Have No Stinkin' Style
- Our approach to design has always been concept-oriented. We
feel that a good concept is the single most important aspect of any
project. Along with effective design and attention to detail, a
strong concept has always made the difference between a good
solution and a great one.
- The diversity of our work provides us with the experience
and ability to approach a range of design problems in a fresh
way.
- Design is the solution of problems, incorporating ideas in
relation to the given problem, rather than the arbitrary
application of fashionable styles.
- We produce design that goes against the jarring nature of
our times.
- We're interested in producing contemporary design, design
that's straightforward looking and appropriate for each
client.
- Our belief is that any one visual problem has an infinite
number of solutions.
- We don't have a style or philosophical framework. We simply
want to understand, then solve the problem.
- We do not have a house style, but favor designs which are
crisp and simple enough to stand out among today's cluttered
communications.
3. Meaningful Relationships
- Our professional ability has been developed and tested for
20 years in a highly competitive environment and has been the basis
of many enduring relationships.
- We pay special attention to creating strong working
relationships among members of the project team. That our approach
works has been proven by the unusual amount of repeat business our
clients have offered us.
- Recognizing that team effort is required to create
successful design, we define our role as a collaborative
one.
- We thrive on long-term client relationships, having many
major corporate clients for years.
- We nurture the client from beginning to end.
Diversified Meaningful
Relationships
- We've maintained variety in the types of projects and
clients that we handle, this has given us the opportunity to
develop a diversified portfolio of work.
- Because of our diversity we've attracted a wonderful group
of multi-talented designers, and we are very proud of
them.
4. Touchy-Feely-Squeezy
- Graphic design should touch the viewer as well as
inform.
- Imagination and sensibility create the most potent visual
communication.
- It's not that we don't believe in a structure or grid; we
just believe they should be felt instead of seen.
- We try to balance our own personal insight with the client's
particular needs—design is a magical balance.
5. Today Is the First Day of the Rest of Our Lives
- Every client, project and problem is unpredictable. Each is
unique. Our mission as a group is to solve the unique problem,
manage the unusual project, and serve our wary client the best
quality design available.
- We welcome the challenge of different business
involvements.
- Our experience allows us to approach a range of design
problems in a fresh way.
6. How Do I Love Me?
- We take great pride in a body of work that has received
national recognition for excellence, and in the roster of
prestigious clients who hired us to create it.
One has to wonder whether these designers and firms read each
other's promotion or whether these pearls just develop over time in
their own hermetically sealed environments. Design firms tend to
stink of their own perfume. In fact, virtually all of the designers
represented by the statements above are fluid and literate when
talking about their work. But put them in front of a keyboard and
they choke up.
Of course, there are those who eschew the conventions of promo
writing. Some designers have gone overboard in the other direction
emphasizing human, rather than business, values like this one:
During our day, we encourage pride but not possessiveness.
Rarely, in an open-office environment can an idea emerge and evolve
without being "touched" by more than one person. And this
interaction is what tests the idea to make sure of its
rightfulness. Others prefer wit and humor, like this send-up of
a famous quote: When I hear the words "design philosophy" I
reach for my X-Acto. (The reference being to Hermann Goring,
who said, "When I hear the word culture, I reach for my
revolver.")
But the most understated and curiously poetic piece that this
writer ever read can be attributed to Henry Wolf in the book New
York Design: "My firm is not unique but it combines the
facilities of photography and design under one roof. I photograph
for my own concepts." Though a masterpiece of clarity and
concision, one might nevertheless wonder, does he get much
work?
About the Author: Steven Heller, co-chair of the Designer as Author MFA and co-founder of the MFA in Design Criticism at School of Visual Arts, is the author of Merz to Emigre and Beyond: Avant Garde Magazine Design of the Twentieth Century (Phaidon Press), Iron Fists: Branding the Totalitarian State (Phaidon Press) and most recently Design Disasters: Great Designers, Fabulous Failure, and Lessons Learned (Allworth Press). He is also the co-author of New Vintage Type (Thames & Hudson), Becoming a Digital Designer (John Wiley & Co.), Teaching Motion Design (Allworth Press) and more. www.hellerbooks.com