From Voice ~ Topics: posters, social responsibility
Where Is the (Brotherly) Love?
Here follows the lamentable but true story of a pro bono project gone awry. The project, which should have been embraced by the City of Brotherly Love, resonated with followers, supporters and members of the press, only to be squashed in the end by a mid-level bureaucrat in City Hall who had the power to reject it.
I had been following the story of rising violence in my hometown since the last few months of 2006, when the total number of homicides in Philadelphia exceeded 400. Of the 406 homicides that year, an overwhelming majority (close to 85 percent) of them were committed with handguns. Though I actually live just outside the city limits, I still call Philadelphia my home. So when a national retailer with headquarters based here offered a glittery handgun-shaped Christmas tree ornament, my tolerance reached its limits and I decided to turn my anger into a positive statement and incite a different kind of call to arms.
A Philadelphia bus shelter with the anti-violence poster temporarily taped to the outside. photo: Todd Vachon
Taking a cue from Milton Glaser and embracing the title Designer/Citizen, I designed a public awareness poster as a plea to stop the senseless killing that had been going on in our city. The poster design would recognize the 2006 homicide victims—listing each name, age, race, date and method of death—and draw attention to this preventable epidemic.
I wanted the poster to be displayed in bus shelters around the city. My interest in the bus shelter as a medium stems from two simple reasons: a 4-by-6-foot poster is relatively large scale compared to my usual work. Equally important, the bus shelter is truly “out there” in public for all to see. I like the fact—and the challenge—that whatever might end up on a bus shelter could be seen by practically anyone, a distinct design challenge compared to the one presented by knowing precisely who your audience will be.
I partnered with the Anti-Violence Partnership of Philadelphia, a nonprofit agency that provides grief counseling to the families of homicide victims and educational outreach in inner-city schools. It is also a civic-minded institution just as concerned as I am that something has to be done. However, with absolutely no marketing budget, it became clear that we would need to raise the money for the production of the posters.
Along the way, I contacted Monica Yant Kinney, a columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer who had been covering in her columns the escalating violence. Yant Kinney was intrigued that a suburban guy like me would even care—enough to try to do something—about the city’s problem and in July wrote an article that addressed the matter.
The article generated additional interest and offers of donations. Specifically, we received an offer of $1,000 as an in-kind donation for the digital printing of the large-format posters. We also received approximately $1,200 in anonymous cash donations from concerned citizens (including $1,000 from a single donor). This was enough to get the campaign started with several posters.
Anti-Violence Partnership of Philadelphia poster.
When we contacted CBS Outdoor, the media company that controls the ad space on all the city’s bus shelters, to make arrangements for placement, an account executive informed us: “The City of Philadelphia rejected your poster for the transit shelters.” After several requests for more specific information as to why it was rejected, I received vague references to “the gun being very intimidating.”
I acknowledge that looking down the barrel of a gun is intimidating. That the poster has elicited this kind of response tells me that it has been (partially) successful. The poster was designed to grab attention—to stop the viewer in his or her tracks if just for a moment—to pause and think about the violence. It was intended to pay homage to the lives of 406 homicide victims, in the hopes of preventing even more. It was meant to make the viewer uneasy, as this is not pleasant subject matter—almost every day people are dying in our streets for no good reason.
After running into this stone wall, I contacted Yant Kinney again and she wrote a follow-up article in August, which revealed that a bureaucrat in City Hall had the power to ding good work even when it was being offered for free. It’s a sad social commentary when it is easier to buy a gun off the street than to get an important, positive message displayed (properly) in bus shelters on the streets.
This was meant to be pro bono work (as in pro bono publico, for the public good). Despite thousands of dollars in donated professional services on the part of the designer, the photographer and the printer—as well as the offer of in-kind donation for digital printing from the service bureau—we were still not able to get this call to action out on the streets where it needs to be seen. Curiously enough, all the donated services to produce the poster have come from individuals and/or businesses located in the suburbs—outside the city limits. But we all share a common hope, desire and plea to stop the violence in our city of Philadelphia.
Ironically, now that the project has been written about in the newspaper and posted online, it has probably reached a wider audience (although a different kind of one) than was originally intended. More people have read about the project and have seen the poster (albeit on a far smaller scale) than would have seen the handful of posters that we tried to produce.
I’m not so naive as to think that some bad guys are going to put down their guns and stop shooting each other just because they saw my poster on their street corner. But what can the average citizen do? Perhaps by raising awareness I could get people talking and thinking, perhaps even force those in power to do something about this urgent issue.
The saddest thing about this whole story is that it will continue, as the number of homicides in Philadelphia in 2007 will most likely exceed the previous year’s.
Meanwhile, I have found glimpses of Brotherly Love in those who stand with me on this cause, such as a local printer who has generously donated the printing of smaller-sized posters that could be more easily distributed. It may not stop the violence, but it’s a step in the right direction.
To receive a printed copy of our “Stop the Violence” poster, contact the Anti-Violence Partnership of Philadelphia.
-
Great story and great work. Keep it up. Don't back down.
I was wondering if a digital version of your poster was available. Thanks. -
It is scary. If I'm on a bus I can't see the names or context- just a big gun pointing at me on a blood red background.
-
As a High School Graphic Design teacher, I am constantly trying to show the kids violence is not an option. Sometimes subjects need to be "scary" to bring true awareness to the severity of the problem.
-
Thanks for trying your best. This is a great example about advocacy design, which is all the more tough with such a sensitive subject. After reading the story as well as a couple comments above mine, it keeps the question alive:
How do you grab your viewer's attention with a strong connection, but in a tactful manner?
It IS a poster. Marcus- you said you found it scary. But did it entice you to walk up to it (if you could) to learn more? Wouldn't that be considered a successful poster design?
Good points, Paul. In today's world of "extreme" design, little is left to the imagination. Stepping back from juicy graphics forces one to think about solving a communication problem with deeper creativity.
This poster reminded me of a piece I saw in PRINT awhile back: a full-page, anti-smoking ad in a newspaper. The design? A single page of standard obituaries, all deaths removed except those who had passed from lung cancer. It was a strong piece, visually and emotionally. The strength of this piece came not from adding content, but removing it to highlight the the problem, and it's excess today.
Frank, I am curious to hear if you could not use a 'big gun' in your piece, how you would have handled it? Or, if you stand by your design as is, and agree the message must be related with bang (no pun intended) or not at all?
Personally, I am not offended by the design. -
What's 'scary' is the homicide rate in Philadelphia.
The question I would ask is "how appropriate is this big gun intimidation to the message?" I would answer that it is dead on. -
Putting all design critique aside for a moment, perhaps your flaw was not with the content of the poster, but with the method you went about trying to post it.
Bus shelters are often placed where they are due to the efforts of a municipal organization; in this case, most likely the City of Philadelphia and SEPTA. Therefore, they get final approval of all advertising posted inside the shelters.
Gun violence is a tremendously volatile issue in the city right now, with Mayor John Street, city council, et al taking a lot of heat for what is a perceived lack of initiative on their part.
Put yourself in the bureaucrat's shoes for a second. You may be trying your best to stem gun violence, and your office may be ready to unveil a wide-reaching, well-thought-out plan to try and curb shootings. Suddenly, an group of well-meaning suburbanites takes it upon themselves to run posters that (it could be argued) draws even more negative attention to the city's (and your office's) perceived inaction. He or she may have had no choice to kill the poster--it may have meant making the public so hostile to the gun issue that no plan would be given fair consideration, good, bad, or otherwise.
In the end, the path you took may have been, in fact, the easiest of three possible directions. You chose the traditional path: Assume you have the possible solution to a problem, raise some cash, and buy some media. Pretty simple, but with the consequence that someone may not agree wholeheartedly with your message, and may try to stand in your way.
Your second direction--a bit harder--would be to run the ad vigilante-style around the city. Which would certainly get taken down quickly, forcing you to spend much more on printing. Not an easy path when you're trying to go pro bono.
The third (and probably most difficult) direction would be to actually research and reach out to the appropriate city organizations and offer your services. Spend some time with them. Learn about their efforts. Then figure out the most effective way to work within their system to get the right message out. Sure, you'll still run into the same bureaucrats, but you might just discover that this time, they're on your side. And your design may be more effective because now you probably have more insight into the issues at hand and can focus your message even more precisely.
Think about it: You'd never walk into a client's office assuming you understand everything about their marketing issues. Why would you assume the opposite when trying to solve a tremendously complex issue like gun violence? -
Frank... You know how I feel... Thank you for your efforts. Scary is not a large photo of a gun on a poster... Scary is when my maintenance man's brother was executed outside of a night club in Philly. Scary is two guys on two different corners threatening to pull guns on me and a friend on South Street one hot Sunday evening. Scary is the city trying to start at 10,000 man vigilante group to do the job of the city. Scary is our city headed toward illegal searches against our federal constitution. Scary is that we have been on this planet so long, and have not come very far... Scary is raising my 3 year old daughter and 5 year old son in this town when the playground they play in South Philly was a murder scene in July... But I still believe in this town and this area. People like you, Frank, show us hope. Keep it up please. Jim Graham, Photographer
-
Well done, Frank.
-
You know what else is scary? That a citizen (designer) has to jump through so many hoops to put up a poster on a PUBLIC bus shelter--in the birthplace of our democracy, no less.
Anyway, my only suggestion, Frank: You should have made the poster seem like it was for a movie. That way, you could have made it as violent as you wanted and no one would have cared. -
Keep going, keep building! You've written a great letter! You've already raised awareness and continue doing so! You're excercising your constitutional right of free speech (although it's cost a good sum), for a good cause. Kudos to all of you who have donated services and time as well.
I don't think the bureaucrats are worried about the general public "becoming hostile to the gun issue". I think they're worried they'll be required to face it and do more to fight it. Crack down on illegal gun sales, ownership, crime.
Sure, Hollywood produces much more violence on movie posters. Hollywood can't be stopped, they're too big. So, when this issue has lots of people backing it, the bureau's will not be able to ignore us, the people who they work for and their interests.
Gun Violence is a very scary issue, your poster attesting to it. Keep going and keep building a consortium of people and our voices; and thusly take action against gun violence. -
I gotta say, I'm very impressed with your work. Your work has gotten my attention, and just shows me the epidemic of the killing that's going on in Philadelphia.
Your work was haunting, and I seriously believe that your work needs to be put in my city of Chicago. Because last year, only more than 40 students at the Chicago Public Schools were victims of gunfire. -
Keep fighting Philadelphia needs you!
-
I do issue advocacy for a living and we have faced many times when publications and places will not post our ads because of the subject matter. It’s a tough and unpleasant situation to be in. It’s a challenge, which forces you to think outside of the box of how to get your message out there.
Just a thought, start an online petition to give to your congressmen to show how many people support making changes. Begin a grassroots campaign to get your message out there. Print ads and posters can be very effective but even more successful when they give people hope. When you just tell someone there is a huge problem but do not provide an avenue for them to do anything about it, your work losses its strength. Start a coalition, write letters to the editor, get an online petition going. Make a huge viral campaign that shows how many people stand behind this issue and understand that things need to change.
I applaud you for taking on this project. There are issues in my hometown that I feel passionate about that need change, and I have not put the time and hard work that you have. I don’t live in Philly but your poster has made me really care about the crime there. -
If your goal was for people to see the poster, then certainly, as you say, the recent publicity has accomplished that goal. It's unfortunate that bureaucracy got in the way of seeing your goal to fruition.
Although you stated that you worked with the Anti-Violence Partnership of Philadelphia, I am wondering if your poster really would have reached the audience that needs to be reached, even if it had successfully passed through the bureaucratic channels? And to that effect, does a poster even exist that can have any effect on violence?
I'm researching this line of thought for my master's thesis, and my preliminary conclusion is that posters like this are for designers — for you and people like you. But how does that make a positive social impact? Is there a better way that we as designers can really make a social difference? Are we reacting and not acting? Do we need to explore the root cause of social issues instead of responding to the end result?
I really enjoyed reading this, and will definitely use it as reference as I continue my thesis work. In order to figure out what does work, we have to figure out what doesn't work and why...even if it's a completely external, unexpected factor. -
I think the point made above about the city's interest in image control on its highly visible bus shelters. Here in DC where we have the highest rate of HIV infection of any U.S. city, WMATA has repeatedly killed transit ads that were seen as too racy, or too frank. So perhaps the secret here is to try to get around this. Make this a truly grassroots campaign -- where citizen activists can print the poster themselves to distribute. Engage local businesses to run the poster in their shop windows. Or look for galleries to run the ads in their windows. Full size in that case.
When I lived in San Francisco, the public arts commission had space available on advertising kiosks on a rotating basis for more politically oriented art and design. Perhaps the way to circumnavigate the bus shelters is to engage Philly's cultural arts department. Or engage the institutions and schools themselves.
This is now a campaign that is bigger than a bus shelter ad.. and need to move the agenda to other, less regulated, spaces and venues.
Don't through in your chips yet! -
Not long ago, I attended a party where there were small children. Two young boys, brothers, at this party were wearing huge gold necklaces holding large gold charms of a handgun.The glorification of handgun possession and handgun use is what is scary. A poster like this can be a wake-up call - and it is getting increasingly harder to create something that gets more than a passing glance. Personally, I'd go so far as to say the poster needs a photo of the bloodied body of one of those killed. Show the results of this gun glorification and what gunplay REALLY does for you.
-
"speechless," and that's coming from a Baltimore native...
-
Did you consider redesigning the poster? It doesn't sound like the city had a problem with addressing the issue of violence, but with the specific image (and scale). It is rare that a designer gets to push through the one idea they think is best, there are usually other stakeholders who have input. Sometimes other stakeholders know something you don't know. Your gut might tell you that this would effectively raise awareness, but maybe some individuals would see this as glorifying handguns -- this graphic image could look cool to those who are into this kind of thing.
Try designing something that will pass the city's review AND raise awareness. Now that would be a challenge. -
Honestly, I think the poster is cliché.
The last thing that would get people to do something about the problem with guns is show them a gun. You can't just show a photo of the problem and say "See!" And the list of people is also cliché. How many times has that been done?
I would think you could do almost any image and the poster would be better. A rubber duck, an apple, a spent bullet casing, almost anything. I looked at the last response above for the first noun that I saw and it was the word "stakeholder". So how about a stake? How about a sense that people are dying so fast you don't have time to make grave markers? How about going to the family of a dozen people that were killed and just ask them to let you photograph something of theirs.
I'm reminded of a 60s newspaper ad in the New York Times on the problem of rats in NYC. The photograph was of a rat BUT it had a dotted line around it and the line was something like "Cut this out and put it next to you child." Then you could see the problem. This poster just reminds me of the problem, but then you get that EVERY night on the Philly news.
The poster needs to be way less noun and way more VERB.
The people in charge probably made the right decision if for the wrong reason.
So, I've been thinking about this for about three minutes. My solution is to put a photo of the DVD of "Death Wish" instead of the gun (yeah, I know they won't let you do it but do it anyway). The problem in my life is that I daydream about going out and getting a gun (I don't own one) and turning into Charles Bronson and bringing down the wrath of God on the people that are the problem. Yes, I do see the contradiction in that. I don't think about it all the time, but I think of it enough to say I daydream about it too much. If I could just find out who the bad guys were. You might get some judges involved like in the Michael Douglas movie "The Star Chamber" so you could single them out.
That then brings me to how you could attract the right crowd who would do something about it and that kind of brings me to "Pulp Fiction." How about just big type that read...
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.
I think that would scare me a bit anyway.
That photo of a gun looks like half of the DVD covers in Blockbuster. -
Of all the comments I read in response to Frank's article, I have the same sentiments as Jim Walls.
Being someone who was born and raised in the city (not the sub-burbs) as well as a designer, I would have looked into one of the other options Jim had presented after the city bureaucrat passed on your first attempt. Either going about it guerrilla-style and posting it everywhere around the city assuring high visibility or partnering with the city officials to find a viable solution to the design/communication issue would still work to help get the word out.
Granted, even with having the poster shot down (no pun intended), you've still been able to garner attention to the problem. However, I don't think that you should stop there and blame this city bureaucrat for placing an obstacle in front of you.
As Jim mentioned, John Street, Sylvester Johnson, and every high ranking official in the city has been catching a lot of heat for the violence going on (last week's ATM robbery that got national attention for instance) and the last thing they need is a poster that could potentially be interpreted as showcasing their ineptitude (which is actually the case in my opinion anyway).
I applaud Frank and his efforts but I would urge him to find another avenue to get the word out. This article is a great way of doing it as well as working with Yant Kinney from the Inquirer. How about getting the Inquirer donate some ad space for your poster or working with CBS to do a billboard? As I drive on I-95, we now have the digital billboards up and I've seen some public outreach campaigns posted on there. Why not pursue that venue? Just some ideas from a fellow Philadelphian/Designer. -
Great work! Keep it up, keep fighting, don't give up. Your poster is a great design. It gets you, it involves you, it makes you think about this issue and acknowledge that it is indeed happening and that it needs urgent attention. You are a great inspiration!
-
I think the design is not helpful. It doesn't achieve its message from a distance. So many movie posters are just people pointing guns at each other. This poster's imagery and colors don't communicate anything more elevated than many of the movie posters. You have a great message to convey. Keep working on it.
-
I feel the design might not be the best but its intentions are great. our media and government like to stand by and watch us suffer. they change nothing. at least the designer is trying to do something about a bad situtation in the way that he knows best. Keep going don't stop the fight!!!
-
Great work,
your poster does point the finger at those who can act, the civilians of Philadelphia. Unfortunately, as you before mentioned, the current audience is a slightly different one than was originally intended.
As a teacher of graphic design and the philosophy and ethics of art, I am constantly bringing to the table new ways in which social and political topics are presented in art and graphic design. Your poster truly is a tribute to the power of design and art. Keep up the good work, one obstacle on the course of many. Thanks. -
I guess my observation would be - why would you assume that just because you are offering it for free, the city would automatically accept your public service initiatives? I think that poster would scare the crap out of tourists, for one ... not a very wise move for city officials.
-
"I guess my observation would be - why would you assume that just because you are offering it for free, the city would automatically accept your public service initiatives? I think that poster would scare the crap out of tourists, for one."
As a production designer at a top ad agency (far removed from inner city madness) I can only agree that Mr. Baseman's design sense is tired and clichéd, and his attitude is right up there with many I work with (the unhappy ones that is). Best this "artist" stick with paid work, let the underdogs with some design moxy handle projecdts that require give and take. -
a few comments:
1. frank: great job. great effort. fight the good fight.
2. where frank lives ("he's suburban") is NOT the issue. that's like saying a man cannot design for girls or that a gay man cannot design for straight men, or any number of red herrings. it shows narrow-minded thinking at best, and i don't wanna talk about the worst.
3. those of you who feel a) the gun is scary or even worse, b) the design is flawed really have to step away from design. period. just like the rest of the world does. it has a headline: The city of brotherly love? it shows a gun. then is reads: stop the violence! end of story and call to action (as i would imagine is what the fineprint is about).
4. regarding "ineptitude" on the part of politicians and policy makers, the sooner the pols put their egos and careers aside, the sooner they can STOP THE VIOLENCE.
5. the fact IS that a blood soaked movie poster probably WOULD be acceptable. sad, but true.
6. aside from living/working in the real world, for both city-folk and suburban-folk, i also teach on-line in the graduate program at the Academy of Art University, San Francisco, from my studio in austin. this semester i pointedly asked students to pick an issue or cause they care about and work on that as their project. my students live in korea, japan, china, and the USofA. one lives in the philly area, where the major conflict SHOULD be between Gene's and Pat's cheesesteaks (with the 3rd band apart being Jim's). which is the long way around the barn, as they say in texas, that for any of you that practice issue advocacy professionally, i'd love to hear from you that i may tap you as resource for this and other projects. i can be reached at shaman@marcenglishdesign.com
7. frank: guys like you that are actually trying to DO something, and failing in the process, are contibuting 100% more than those who succeed at doing nothing. fuck them. fight the good fight. -
"frank: guys like you that are actually trying to DO something, and failing in the process, are contibuting 100% more than those who succeed at doing nothing. fuck them. fight the good fight."
I agree with what you're saying, Marc, but isn't this is an overly aggressive tone for defending an anti-gun violence poster? -
craig, is it overly aggressive because i used the word "fuck"? or because i am suggesting that someone "fight" a good "fight"? or is it because i am patently dismissing the naysayers, the doubters, and those that add nothing but ill-served criticism that is off-message and offensive?
in the world i live in i hear people swear. my friends curse. not all of them. i've never heard frank swear. maybe he does. but it really chaps my ass when i see people like mr. baseman actually TRYING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE and then seeing both his design aesthetic and methodology belittled. baby and the bathwater.
i'm no saint, but it pleases me to know that even the master of peace, JC, got a little pissed off in the temple and started throwing things around. WWJD, indeed. hey people! the crucifix is a cliche too! sorry....don't get me started. have just had it up to HERE with both hypocrisy (the pols and the process) and designers with the old approach of "Q: how many designers does it take to do an campaign that the COMMON person can understand? A: 100. One to do it and 99 to say 'I could have done it better.'"
so to the naysayers, i would suggest you put your money where you mouth is and make it happen. and since i'm NOT, i will greatly appreciate the efforts mr. baseman has contributed and wish him and those who hope to make the city of brotherly love safer Godspeed. and the rest?
there is an immense gap between success and failure. i have yet to see many film critics make a film or art critics make art. but when a designer has the cojones to take to task frank's efforts, or anticipate the minds of politicians and policies, i really wish those designers HAD become cake decoraters.
saying i'm over agressive about being bugged, and articulating it like one who is bugged is the equivilent of those who suggest frank not use a gun when discussing gun violence. people SHOULD be bugged about this, not his fucking typography. end of rant. end of expletives. back to a peaceful evening. -
And this is why Marc is a true design shaman.
Frank is to be congratulated first for his heroic efforts on behalf of the city he loves and secondly for a design that has impact. In my mind, those of you criticizing his work are welcome to your opinions but they are wrong.
I know Frank to be a great human. A great designer. And obviously a great humanitarian. Keep pushing at it. -
Hi Frank
I've followed your story in the local media and on this blog with great interest because for the past decade I have taught a course in Social Marketing at Moore College of Art & Design (in center city Philadelphia). This year my class has focused on the topic of gun violence in Philadelphia. Perhaps our story will give you more hope about how designers in this city can make a difference:
We started the project with extensive research on our topic using internet, newspaper and local government data. In addition we were fortunate to work with urban marketing experts officially contracted with local government to study the problem of gun violence in Philadelphia. They generously provided us with findings from focus groups comprised of the population who are at the epicenter of the problem.
My students also asked the questions, "How can a group of college women possibly understand the pressures and issues that surround a inner-city male?" AND "What difference can a poster really make anyway?"
We learned from the experts that a poster is most effectively used as a starting point to begin a dialogue and should followed by a coordinated campaign of media messages and community involvement. We also learned that the best posters offer not only a message but also a solution or referral to a place where solutions are offered.
In the end the students chose to design posters that preempted gun violence by encouraging teens to make the right life choices to improve their futures and included information on where to go for help in conflict resolution and educational support. Their posters will be tested in appropriate focus groups, reworked to have the maximum impact on our audience and will be distributed through established channels to the local community.
We hope this helps those considering entering the arena of social marketing and we ask to hear about positive experiences from other designers. -
Marc,
I understand where you're coming from and I share your frustration with some of the comments above, but in the interest of having a constructive discussion, I'm only suggesting that we be careful in how we say what we say.
Respectfully,
Craig -
Thoughtful discussion is encouraged, but please show respect and consideration to other readers, and remember this is a public forum.
Thank you,
Sue Apfelbaum
Managing editor, VOICE -
I dont understand, why everyone is cheering and congradulating "Frank"? He's created a anti-gun poster, but I dont think its fighting gun crime, the way all of you think it is... The truth is that it is not going to stop gun crime, "Only people can stop gun crime". I'm not trying to be negative in any way, the poster's intentions and purpose is good, "hopefully" it will make someone have a change of heart or think before using a gun... How can any of you be sure that the poster is working... Are you out there commiting gun crimes, has someone told you that they changed because of the poster? With issues like this, we should not look at the 'design from a designers point of view', as im sure most of us would agree; 'the poster works'. What about the target audience, is working for/to them? Remember what the poster is up against, with regards to both subject matter and where it is placed. To us as designers it is intriguing, but to the intend audience it may be just another poster on a bus stop about gun crime... Stop the claims as to 'how successful the poster is' and focus on the aim of the poster, this one poster is not going to do what it intends to do(alone). It's getting over rated.
-
The best thing this poster has done is get us talking, thinking about the issue. While we're also debating the worth/design of the poster, we ARE still talking about it. I believe that is the intention. I'm glad in a way that this poster has been so ill-received and pushed away from the public. Nothing will put this issue (and the poster)in a brighter light than blogging, retelling and linking to this poster's wayward history. Let the community push the story upward. Link to it, talk about it, blog it, digg it. Hearing the designer's side of this has given the poster more impact, and I think the poster will have greater value online than even we ever thought possible in print.
-
Hi Frank,
Great poster. When I read the fact that 406 people were victims of homocide (not to mention all the victims of violent crime that lived to tell about it) last year in Philadelphia I kept coming back to that staggering statistic trying to put it in some sort of context that seems believable. The image of the gun in my opinion becomes secondary. That number (406)is a message on its own considering that it would reflect one-tenth of the entire population of the town I live in here in coastal Maine. Having studied together at Tyler I applaud your effort, willingness, and the socially responsible use of your talent to address what should be veiwed as an epidemic. I can't imagine the public awareness campaign that would have been initiated with public funds had that same number of people died of the bird flu.
Keep up the great work!
Mike -
Frank,
I think you should only be applauded for your motivation in seeing a problem and trying to the best of your formidable abilities to do something about it.
To those who question the efficacy of his efforts, the important thing is he saw a situation and responded by trying to help. The world is a better place when each of us is so motivated.
And to Nancy teaching at Moore,
Your class program sounds very encouraging and important for young designer minds. You had asked to hear about positive experiences from other designers and I offer this. After some years of doing pro bono design work off and on for the various organizations I cared about, the most rewarding work happened when I got out from behind my computer and volunteered.
I think Frank's story reflects both of those aspects as well, he got involved, got to know people who were working on the issue, and responded both as a designer and a human being. And he is now obviously much more engaged in the issue beyond the designing of a poster.
Thanks, Frank -
Frank,
Its inspiring to learn of individuals who understand that change takes action. Your poster gets the public involved, to face the truth they would rather ignore because ,lets face it, who wants to deal with such a touchy subject.
As a student of graphic design at Philadelphia's Drexel University i not only have a passion for design but also in the fundamental purpose of design....communication. Your work is encouraging to me and reminds me of why i chose to study design. Not just for the creative aspect but that its an empowering tool that stirs the people. Philadelphia is my home for now and i have found it to be a inviting city. I dont want to be witness to it loosing the battle agianst violence.
Your poster is one step in the right direction and it deserves to be seen.
Dont stop trying....Philadelphia needs to be awakened. -
As we say in LA, "Can't we all get along."
I say "Yes", but we need to have courage and advocacy. Frank, I think this is great, and I'm inspired by your effort.
For LA, the gun would be a sawed off semi-automatic. That's scary and that's reality. I think your poster doesn't need to be redesigned; it's perfect. Let's go get them up ourselves. I've never been to Philadelphia. -
Frank,
As others here have, I applaud your effort and your desire to do something about the problem. I live in Chicago were we also face the problems of gun violence.
Design aesthetics aside, I still have a couple of problems with your design.
1. It's difficult to tell who your target audience is. If it's city officials, you don't need to be at bus stops.
If your audience is kids in gangs your message is way off. The gun looks beautiful (glorified, cool). The headline is sarcastic. And the call to action is weak. It's shouting (not the best way to get kids to listen) and weak. It's better to tell someone what to do instead of what not to do. That may be the reason some of these kids end up in gangs - they literally don't know what else to do - and this poster doesn't offer any options.
Also, just seeing a gun isn't as impactful as we would like it to be - we see them everywhere, all the time. A gun in a crib - different effect.
2. Who is your client? If it's the city obviously they aren't satisfied so as a designer you need to start over - preferably by asking a few questions first. I'm sure they have plans (effective or not) and they would want anything done FOR them to work with their overall plan.
If you and your fellow citizens are your client then you have to go vigilante. Tricky? Yes, but it's been done before to great effect - Keith Haring, Jenny Holzer.
3. You may be inadvertantly contributing to the problem. We are desensitized to voilence because we see it so much. (Big gun). Also, it's not hard to imagine a gang member, killer, reading the list of names for his victims as a source of pride. Twisted? Maybe to us. (Again, consider your audience.) And, not to get to metaphysical but what you put out comes back. So what is this poster putting out? Sarcasm, a giant gun, victims - it's a violent poster.
You can't put out fire with fire.
I really think you are on the right track getting involved and trying to be part of the solution. I think you've done a lot to raise awareness in the design community. Keep it up!
Peace. -
Emily,
I appreciate your critique, but you are so wrong on all points. It's an evocative and striking image and the target audience is obviously the silent majority. It's like the G8 'Make Poverty History' protests at Glen Eagles in Scotland (and indeed elsewhere around the world) during the G8 summit. They weren't actually targtted at Blair, Bush Schroder or anyone else. They were about raising public awareness that it was still an issue.
Just like this campaign...... -
Frank - great job at creating a poster that will create awareness and is attention-getting. The folks at city hall should not be making decisions by whether they like it or not. As a design professional I think you have a responsibility to use your talents to create awareness and cause people to think.
I suggest that you meet with the individual city council folks and plea your case for improving awareness and creating a buzz rather than shutting it down. Keep up the good work! -
Emily, you nailed it.
The poster makes the gun look like a cannon.
A powerful image, enough to make me go out of my way to avoid looking down the barrel or have it aimed at my back. At first I would feel fear, then resentment. After enough exposure to it, apathy.
Victim's names are like notches on a gun belt.
Keeping score for the bad guys, an incentive to score even more points. I see the parallel to the Vietnam Memorial, but that list of the violently killed was installed well after the conflict ended. It's black marble, not blood-red paper. Somber, mournful, respectful.
Red signals power, dominance, anger.
Exposure to the color of blood is known to increase heart rate and incite aggressive feelings. The dominating red background adds fuel to the fire. It doesn't serve as a memorial to the dead so much as it recalls the blood spilled. I wouldn't want my name on it, under the gun, because I would want to be remembered for my life and not a tragic death.
It IS a cool graphic.
As a designer and fan of Adbusters and First Things First, I see why designers like it. As a peace activist I feel why compassionate people want something bold to be done to stop this horrendous situation. As a business person I understand local commerce that says, don't put that poster anywhere near my building because I want healthy and prosperous energy here. That poster would draw criminals, affecting everyone nearby. As a service business I understand that those who pay have the say. Because Frank donated his time and got other contributors to print the posters, he's a stakeholder. Because the City controls the distribution - the bus stops - they're a stakeholder, along with local businesses and other taxpayers. Certainly victims and their families have an interest here. So this is not a project that can be undertaken in a vacuum.
The best thing about this poster
is the attention it's gotten for this issue, the demand it places on other interested parties to step up and do something real, because if they don't Frank will and then they lose any control.
The biggest problem with this poster
is the target audience, the very criminals it's designed for. People who kill people with guns would want it. The poster would be a gift, a cool item to rip off and hang in the cave. For some it's even personalized with the names of their victims. Something to show off - virulent marketing among killers and wannabe killers.
What would I do?
One poster isn't going to fix Philadelphia's murder rate. It will take a sustained range of efforts to clean up and lock up, engage and educate. But if I were to create imagery that might have the potential to decrease murders, I would show what I want to see. If most of the killers and victims are Black I would show Black people having fun together. Intact families walking down the street, looking prosperous and happy. Groups of teens singing and laughing. Maybe other imagery would be like that of the old US and Soviet propaganda posters showing people looking noble, engaged in honest work.
All these bloody movies and gangsta rappers have envisioned the world as a mean, ugly place where profit and power trumps love and life. Their imagery has driven this madness. Exactly why design can be so powerful.
I would give people a vision of what peace looks like. I would focus on prosperity, happiness, love and kindness.
It's worth a shot. -
I agree with some of the above comments about the fact that a poster like this could certainly encourage gun toting gang members to continue doing so - It's not going to scare the criminals, the murders - it's going to scare the citizens.
Gang/criminal awareness doesn't help combat gang/criminal violence - it further empowers the gang/criminals.
Citizens can't combat gun violence - it's up to the city's police force. If you want to worry the gang members a poster emphasizing the consequences would be more fitting.
I'm glad Frank made the effort - but I agree with the city's decision; hopefully for the same reasons. I encourage another attempt with a different direction. -
Hi, Frank.
I'm sorry, but your first mistake was logging onto the internet and calling this man a "mid-level Beaurocrat". This man is your primary customer- he's the one you need to please in order to fulfill your objectives.
Delicate structures like glass bus shelters and fancy electric signs are not designed to make the public aware of any pressing problems; they are designed to trick gullible tourists into believing that the city is ultra-modern (like Japan) and crime free.
As soon as your design was rejected you should have sent a thank you letter and asked what you needed to do in order to improve your chances of success next time. Think about it: If you were trying to sell a design to a regular client on the street, you wouldn't call them a fat stupid idiot if they declined to buy. Would you? -
I applaud the efforts of a citizen/designer in trying to do something with the skills they have to help heal the world they live in. I disagree with the idea that the conversation around this poster has raised awareness of the gun violence in Philadelphia. Gun violence in Philadelphia has raised awareness of gun violence in Philadelphia. The failure of this poster to be accepted by the city has raised awareness of the poster's existence to designers - arguably not it's intended audience.
It was also my first instinct to strongly disapprove of the actual design. It is well executed, but the enormous, well-photographed gun on a bold, red background glorifies the gun in the same way that posters for violent movies do.
American Gangster
Pulp Fiction
Scarface
The Kill Point
Those posters are awesome.
Your poster has the same effect. Standing back from the design, all else becomes secondary except for the powerful gun imagery. It makes it look cool. It is bold, prideful, intimidating. Owning a gun makes you feel powerful. This poster reinforces that, rather than discourages it. -
re:
American Gangster
Pulp Fiction
Scarface
The Kill Point
Those were supposed to link to posters. Didn't know I couldn't post html.
A friend's observation of a poster in Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn probably sums it up:
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/89477635@N00/1647336504" http://www.flickr.com/photos/89477635@N00/1647336504target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/89477635@N00/1647336504>/ -
I've held my toungue for awhile on the subject because this poster really angered me!
I have to say the poster is nice looking but it's totally ineffective on "function". Meaning is it supposed to remind citizens that we obviously have a gun problem, or scare them into not wanting to tote a gun? I just don't get it.
I applaud the concern and the need to take action but there are so many other ways to do this besides putting a poster of a gun on a bus stop scaring people who actually take the bus and live in the city that we have a gun problem. It's like someone is drowning and you are describing the water.
This is about addressing the underlying problem of why these kids (Black males) are killing each other and now "police officers". The main problem is that these kids are either high-school drop-outs,in and out of jail, (minor offenses), kids shuffled around through foster care due to break down in the family unit, no role models, the list goes on. And you all wonder why the administration won't except a violent poster that happens to look cool . . ?
Why not use the antithesis of the gun/violent image and use a "book" as a weapon with a message "dare to change". Putting down a gun and picking up a book. Something to that extent.
I doubt any of you truly understood that the whole battle of 50 cent versus Kanye West was more than just a marketing scheme to sell lots of records. The public chose Kanye (well he outsold 50 Cent and topped all the charts in the first week) because he raps about social/society issues, religion, etc. . while Mr. Cents raps about gun toting, "gangsta" violence, calling women "ho's". etc. The public wants music with real content and meaning and this filters down to our kids because it is what they listen too. It's a huge debate going on right now in the community. www.soulgen.com, it's on CNN, Bill Mahr, Local News.
The bottom line and a great lesson, for any and every designer is to understand your audience,community, before you even pick up the pen or mouse. -
Challenge to everyone critiquing this poster from your desks.
Get off your asses and do something like this for a cause that is important to you.
We can all nit pick choices of image, color, type, theme, media, etc. on any piece of design. And no one piece will be perfect or create instant change. But if each member of the design community put this kind of effort and passion into solving problems in their community we would make a significant impact.
Frank, thanks for making some noise. -
I applaud designers looking to get involved in the public sector. From the previous dialogs I feel that I should state that my comments are not a commentary on Frank as a person, but what we can learn from his story.
We should all look at how this campaign was undertaken. While it seems that passion and emotion went into this piece, strategy and research seem to be significantly lacking, and these are critical to good design. There doesn't seem to be enough research into the root of gun violence or looking to past learning, such as other ineffective/effective anti-violence campaigns. This would help structure the desired interaction with the poster. If the target audience is the inactive public, there is no call to action. Should they take an active role in city politics/government? Become an inner-city mentor? Support a non-profit? How the viewer gets more information about being part of a solution is really unclear.
If the ultimate goal, as stated, was to raise awareness, isn't the question to ask, if that is actually an issue? Are people living in Philadelphia actually unaware of the violence (it seems no) or just with no clear way to make changes?
While it's easy to write off city officials, the first step should have been to try and involve them. Regardless of how effective you find them, the city has spent more time, money and analysis on the issue and possible solutions than any designer, and have learning to contribute. It's important to remember that high crime rates are not in their interest either, for their social approval or the economic state of the city. After they are unwilling or unable to work with the designer, a grassroots campaign should be considered.
For designers who consider this successful, I'd like to point out my feeling that it's distasteful to use victim's names/information in a campaign without the permission of their family. Further, calling them out and color coding them only by their race further victimizes them, stripping them of their individuality and emphasizing membership to a group as the only trend. Why not code them by the location/neighborhood that they were killed in? Is it possible that violence is centralized in the city, and that looking at environmental factors in those areas is more likely to yield solutions than pointing out race? -
Vilifying the firearm is simply ignorant. Put pictures of the PEOPLE doing the killing, not the instrument by which they choose to carry out their murderous tirades.
-
I attended the Forum on Sat, Dec. 16. and I was really moved. I am not posting to comment about what should of been done or what was not "appropriate" in your design, that is beside the point. The point is that you cared enough to do what you did, how many of these other people can say the same?
-
When I first saw the Design you have created I was really attracted to it! I think first and foremost: it looks cool! Bright colors and a BIG GUN look really modern here!
I think this will cause a problem with younger kids and it might make it seem acceptable and cool, without even reading the statement; although I think a more mature audience will WANT to read it and Get the Point! It sort of seems like we're desensitizing the young ones and making it fun and ok.
Although my initial reaction is yes I withdraw it to a No and maybe suggest a more "REaL" more humane visual. One with more sad undertones with the emphasis on loss of life ~ a gun dripping blood with violent photographs that indicate that it is wrong using colors and visuals...now this is more scary, not necessarily "cool". It shouldn't be so cool. But definately a gifted artist here. -
My niece was carjacked and murdered at the age of 23 in Tuscon, Arizona. It was November 27, 2000 when she disappeared. She was a nurse at the University Medical Center in the transplant ward. She worked the night shift because she never slept at night and all she wanted to do from the age of 7 was to be a nurse and help people. The night she was carjacked, she was on her way to return some video tapes, pick up her mail and go home. Well, she never made it past dropping off the video tapes. The two scumbags that murdered her were given life sentances without parole (if you believe that) and hopefully they will never be able to harm another person in their lives. Since I have no faith at all in the justice system, I do keep a close eye on them to make sure they are still locked up. I do not believe for one minute that a life sentance means a life sentance. I applaud anybody who fights for the rights of victims and wants to STOP THE VOILENCE. My nephew, her brother, was 11 years old at the time and now, 7 years later, has finally come to grips with what has happened. He has started a foundation in her name and we are working together, along with all of our family members to get the word out. His goal is to give somebody the opportunity to get their nursing degree through the college she attended. The only contribution I can make is to make bracelets and help sell them the put money into the scholarship fund. If anybody is interested, he is in the beginning stages of working on the website but any help you can offer him would be wonderful. The name of the foundations is AmandaStarrFoundation. Pass the word, pass the foundation name, look after your family, children and neighbors and, please, STOP THE VOILENCE......
-
I believe this effort was amazing, and I'm glad that you still stay positive after the higher-ups decided to stop the original project. I think you are right in that the very opposition made to halt the project instead spread the news to those who would have never heard of it.
-
Wow! This is truelly a great story.Even though your effort was not in vain it still hasnt paid off like you wanted it to but i'm sure it will. The poster IS a litlle scary but it definatly gets the message accross. Keep up the great work! :)
-
The violence is not a product of the gun. The gun is merely a tool of the violence. Just as it is a tool, here, for the designer. The fear that the picture of the gun instills in the viewer is exactly why the poster works. The same fear of the violence is the purpose of the poster. "If you were looking down the barrel of a real gun, what would you do?"
-
How exactly do the government officials expect you to make the public aware of the deaths of 406 people without illiciting a response?
-
I don't like guns but this poster is telling the truth we don't like to see. The big revolver with a red background. Nobody can miss that. The poster, I hope achieves its objectives the awarness of the violence in Philadelphia. Guns are not toys and each and everybody should choose to keep them away from the streets and homes.The best way to protect our families and ourselves is to have love for each other because love does not kill.
-
Frank Baseman was just nominated for a great honor, the AIGA Philadelphia Fellow Award. Congrats Frank!
The Fellow Award Dinner honoring Frank is June 26th, 2008. For more info:
http://philadelphia.aiga.org/events.html#2008_FellowDinner

Comments