From Voice ~ Topics: graphic design, industrial design, personal essay
The Measure of a Designer
I stand two feet from my husband, John, and hear a tick tick tick that runs with the precision of a Swiss watch. (Is that expression used anymore? Are Swiss watches still made with the noteworthy precision that they once were?) I wonder about the mechanism making that telltale sound, the new valve in his heart. Does it come with a battery? Do I have to change it? No, John is the battery, and his heart’s natural blood-flow through the valve is what makes it “tick.”
The valve I imagine is exquisitely simple, an elegant gizmo made from new-fangled synthetics—no whalebone or catgut here—engineered with the latest polymers to high-tech manufacturing standards to, say, thousandths of a millimeter (or even smaller). The exactness flips out my mind. Or does it? As a designer, I understand basic engineering, too.
From left: Illustrations of the human heart from Gray’s Anatomy (1918) and the Bjork-Shiley valve of the 1970s (source: Wikimedia Commons).
In the 1980s, I worked with a printing rep who promised to introduce me to a company in New Jersey that manufactured replacement parts for humans: man-made sockets and hips and other joints. The rep showed me photographs of some of these devices, and they were beautiful, looking more like miniature pure-white Henry Moore sculptures than prosthetic devices. Nothing ever came of this project, but the images have stayed with me and I recall their beauty whenever I think of John’s repaired heart.
Designers help make stuff. Some of this is junk that litters the world, making it an overcrowded place to live—too many consumer products provide no enhanced quality of life. One of the most vivid memories I have from when my mother, who was a master of tidiness and organization, was critically ill, is of the “stuff” that would just accumulate on her hospital bed tray—you know, that nasty, ill-functioning 1 x 3 ft. table that is supposed to go up and down so you can perform normal functions like eat while reclining in bed. Imagine that while you doze, strange, unwanted objects appear but rarely disappear from this space in front of you: cups, wiping clothes, containers, literature, the general detritus of medical care (yuck!). You have no control over the way this space looks or how these objects are arranged because you are too weak to do anything about it. My mom found that tray to be viscerally annoying. As often as possible, I would throw unnecessary items away and arrange what was left in sensible order. Every time I would do it, my mom would visibly relax and become more coherent.
One thing we can all do as professional designers is to help give order and meaning to everyday existence by being good organizers, critical thinkers and aesthetes. As a designer, I have learned to do this for a living. Putting things in order is a trait I inherited from my mom and is reinforced by my husband.
Valentine’s Day card design by Nancy Sharon Collins for Jeff Mckay, Inc., NYC and Miami.
As a designer, I aspire to work on projects as important as improving the human experience, but content myself with exacting my craft on behalf of my clients. Each year I design a Valentine’s Day card for an old client, always using a unique manufacturing process. Paper, scoring, cutting and trapping specifications go into the one-thousandths of an inch. I revel in discussions with the die cutter about where to place the artwork on what portion of the spine of a fold-over card. I can “see” what he is advising me—the art has to “wrap” enough into the spine so it “appears” to stop on the front of the card and not bleed to the back. This is why magnifying in the thousands is so useful in programs such as Adobe Illustrator. Eyeballing is crucial. Being able to see when proportions and individual pieces work together, and when they need improvement, is a gift—this acuity is engineering in consort with aesthetics.
(To the consternation of the rest of my family, my mother could tell if a picture was hung crookedly on a wall by a 16th of an inch, it was an innate ability. While a picture on a wall is non-crucial, if the fix in my husband’s heart had been off that much, he would be dead.)
In autumn of 2000, I was diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent a bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. After six months of intensive chemo and several more surgical procedures to finish my new set of breasts, it was time to make the nipples.
From my mother, I learned perfect composition and can identify incorrect measurements down to a 64th of an inch with my naked eye. In the cold O.R. at New York’s Lenox Hill Hospital, the Park Avenue plastic surgeon was chagrined when I said I wanted to tell them where I wanted the two new concentric circles that would be my nipples and areola to be placed. We argued—the surgeon’s assistant wanted to measure and I said, no, this has to be done optically. Thus I stood buck-naked before a mirror and the 12-member surgical team, with a Sharpie marker in my hand. To my satisfaction, when the surgeon’s assistant measured my work with his millimeter ruler, it was quantifiably perfect.
I teach my students that researching a design problem is at least half of discovering the solution. Prior to my surgeries I studied shapes and dispositions of height, angle and stress pertaining to my favorite breast shapes. When it came time for the “mark-up,” my trained eye was understandably accurate.
Currently, I am documenting oral histories from southern Louisiana graphic artists to make public the rich design legacy of our region. As we wrapped-up an interview with Kathy Cain and Paulette Hurdlik, principle and principle emerita of Zehno Cross Media Communications, the first “girl” design shop in New Orleans, they talked about how they process prospective employees. A deal breaker is when they ask, by what percent does the candidate more enjoy design: the artistic part or the engineering part? If the engineering attraction is not at least 50 percent, the applicant is immediately disqualified.
I agree with Kathy and Paulette—making things pleasing to look at is half function and half aesthetics. No brush with mortality or major health “event” is welcome, but it does afford a lot of valuable time in intimate proximity to hospitals, doctors, nursing and all of those industrial decisions that end up as protocols and products for something called “quality of life.” This reminds me that our job as thoughtful, accomplished designers is to use our abilities wisely, with sensitivity to others and the world’s needs.
-
This article is truly amazing!
-
Very thought-provoking and touching!
-
This should be in school text books! Great post Nancy.
-
Dear Nancy,
I have always felt that building a perfect structure for the design solution is as important (if not more) as the solution itself.
Thanks a lot for assuring me that I am not wrong in the way I think.
Regards,
Karthik -
A lovely essay. I was especially moved by your illustration of how. when it comes to precision, a designer's practiced eye can trump instruments of measurement. In a similar, but not identical, vein an eye surgeon once told me, “The subjective is more accurate than the objective by several orders of magnitude.”
-
Very interesting article ... really enjoyed it. Can totally relate to wanting to rearrange a hospital room!
-
Excellent read. Nancy this article reinforced my responsibility as a designer and the standard I want to start and continue to hold myself to. Thank you so much!
-
"As a designer, I understand basic engineering, too." A pretty bold statement, one with which I'm sure most tenured engineers would wholeheartedly disagree. Similarities exist in all fields, and comparing them just because they involve creation is somewhat obtuse. Engineering and design are light years apart, especially in terms of the complexity and gray matter involved. I know I'll get a lot of dirty looks for saying this, but any good engineer could probably become a designer. Not every good designer could be an engineer. [p.s. I mean real engineering. Mechanical, electrical, nuclear, computer. Not so much titles with 'engineer' casually appended. Software engineer is about as liberal as I'll get.]
-
I can't agree more that design needs is best when it is focused on the needs of others.
It's also remarkable how many man-hours it takes to design parts that replace what is given naturally to many at birth. The human body is amazing. -
This article is very interesting. Design has to do with every bit of precision, and it will be hard to succeed in the design world if you don't have an eye for it.
-
This is a lovely piece.
-
Dear Nancy - So often in life I have found myself in the unenviable position of having to defend the arts. That uncomfortable position of having to illustrate, demonstarte, substantiate the importance, gravity, relevance of the arts to business, to life, and in relationship to many other things. In your beautiful and touchingly personal essay you have done it all. Thank you for being you and for putting what we both so love into context. I love amd miss you lots.
Peace,
Suzan -
Intersting article Nancy. I can relate to your hospital tray story – what a good example of why design should focus on the individual need. As you say, research is the key to the final design. Wendy.
-
Thank you, Nancy. Such wise, reflective context and honesty!
-
Good article!
-
I love this article
-
As accurate as it is wonderful. You've explained the unexplainable in an unforgettable way, Susan.
-
Fantastic summary of the designer's responsibilities. When asked by young or aspiring designers what I think is the best place to gain experience, I always reply "Go to work at a printer." It doesn't need to be big, a small shop with a couple of 2-color presses is probably ideal, because it will give you one-on-one time with the pressman, with whom you should become best friends. Once you see the man who stands at the ready with a spatula of ink, you begin to understand the necessity for, and implications of, exact measurements when it comes to things like trap, fold, cut, etc.

Comments