Forgot your username or password?
In 1917 Marcel Duchamp, under the pseudonym
“R. Mutt,” submitted a urinal to the New York Society of Independent
Artists. Despite the Society’s statement that it would accept work by
any artist who paid the six dollar fee, the “readymade” was rejected.
“Whether Mr. Mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no
importance,” Duchamp wrote in his magazine The Blind Man. ”He
chose. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful
significance disappeared under the new title and point of view—created a
new thought for the object.”
With that puckish, unpromising piece of provocation was born one of the
most productive currents in 20th century culture, Conceptual Art. Forty
years after Duchamp’s urinal made its first splash, the shock waves of
its influence were still spreading. John Cage picked up the theme, and
by the 1960s composers such as Lamonte Young and Cornelius Cardew were
making conceptual music: (“Tune a brook,” wrote Cardew, “by moving the
stones in it.”)
But has there ever been “Conceptual Design?” At first glance the
question looks silly; all design is “conceptual” in the sense that it
depends on the conceptualization of problems and solutions. But how
could the rarefied, ridiculous intellectual games of a Duchamp or a Cage
work in an applied art, a field where briefs and clients, not critics,
collectors and curators, define the parameters?
Even those hostile to the idea of “Conceptual Design” might want to
agree that some branches of design are more “conceptual” than others.
Graphic design might be more “conceptual” than furniture design, for
instance, and design teaching might be more “conceptual” than graphic
work. If we accept Duchamp’s definition—the replacement of an object’s
“usual significance” by a “new thought”—then every startlingly original
design is in some way conceptual. It’s conceptual when Philippe Starck
takes George Carwardine’s classic 1932 anglepoise table-lamp design and
reproduces it, blown up huge, as a floor-lamp for Flos.
But to be truly “conceptual” in the way that Conceptual Art is, design
would have to cut its ties with objects, materials and practicality. The
concept would have to become sufficient, in and of itself; the idea
would have to be the finished design.
Are we seeing something like this happening in design? I think we are.
There’s a generation of young designers who, almost a century after
Duchamp, seem to share something of his spirit. In recent months I’ve
interviewed young designers like Åbäke, Alex Rich and
Redesigndeutschland. What I notice about their work is that it shares a
quality I can only describe with words like “conceptual” or
“immaterial.” Rather than products, these people are designing
situations, intervening in existing arrangements, framing everyday
activities in ways that make us think of them, unexpectedly, as
“design.” And although they’re often satirical in tone, these designers
share a concern with ethics and responsibility; one of the reasons the
design they make is so often immaterial is their sense that the last
thing the world needs is more objects, more consumer goods. The widening
ripples of Duchamp’s gesture blend, in their work, with the
repercussions of a gathering concern around issues like sustainability,
community and responsibility: to be conceptual is, after all, to be
The first Åbäke piece I saw was design you could eat: a “trattoria” they
organized this May as part of the Berlin event Designmai. The food was
delicious, but there was also the sense that the designers, even as they
prepared yogurt with mint, olive bread, tomatoes, radishes and
mozzarella for an invited audience of about 40 people, were making a
“performance” in the manner of contemporary artists like Rirkrit
Tiravanija (who served Thai vegetable curry at 303 Gallery on New York’s
Spring Street) or Susan Ciancolo (who made an installation called Run
Restaurant at Alleged). Their latest projects include setting up a
“plant exchange” at London’s Columbia Road Flower Market.
Redesigndeutschland, based in Berlin, Germany, mock design’s hopeless,
triumphalist fascination with standardization by proposing a universal
photography portrait format, a decimal organization of time, and a new
unit of measurement, the RIN. Alex Rich is a British designer now
based in Tokyo. He likes to describe what he does as “gentle
intervention”. When I interviewed him for ID magazine recently he told
me he’d collaborated with Åbäke on a London project which involved
“reverse-vandalizing” the benches in an East London park. Without a
client, and without the permission of the local authorities, Rich and
friends mended several public benches which had been reduced, by
vandalism, to bare concrete struts. In another “action,” Rich made a
series of T-shirts reproducing murals visible from the entrance to
Finsbury Park train station in North London. He then asked actors to
stand around the subway exit wearing the shirts, hoping that commuters
would be surprised—and perhaps charmed—to see T-shirts bearing a
reference to something local instead of something distant or global.
Rich’s themes overlap with ideas familiar from conceptual art movements
like Situationism, Psychogeography and Appropriationism. But, says Rich,
“appropriation and intervention are not really the same thing.
Appropriation means taking over ownership; intervention means leaving
something in the public domain.”
If what we’re seeing really is the impact, a hundred years on, of
Conceptual Art on the discipline of design, it’s nice to see that, in
the interim, something has been added to Duchamp’s playful
mischief-making: a social conscience.
In case you didn’t notice, we’re already halfway through 2014. It’s time to turn and face the future—and design the one we want.
David Brin, the noted science fiction writer (and one of my favorites) wrote an article for Bloomberg six months ago describing how a new century doesn’t get started until about year 14. Brin and I must be on the same wavelength. A year ago, I asked AIGA’s executive director Ric Grefé...
Section: Inspiration -
Conference , graphic design, professional development
The redesign is not meant to indirectly criticize someone’s work; rather it is a quest to present content from another perspective.
Weekend Heller: Experiments With Style
Posted by Steven Heller
10 days ago from
Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers
Thirty Conversations on Design
Little & Company
Designers fashion beautiful dresses out of thousands of @Crayola crayons, via @Creative_Boom: http://t.co/3ekYgfgbOp http://t.co/3RTHgRVnO4
An hour ago
kate spade new york packaging program
kate spade new york
Creative Manager- The Arizona Sports Foundation (Fiesta Bowl)
February 19, 2015
What’s Up With Your Workspace?
February 18, 2015
2009 Membership Party Invitation