Forgot your username or password?
When Khoi Vinh left his prestigious post as design
director for NYTimes.com in July 2010, it wasn't for an even better title at an even bigger
company but to pursue something all his own. After four years leading the
visual and interactive experience of one of the top 100 websites in the
world, he wrote a book on the grid-based design principles he applied at the Times, and he became an entrepreneur. He was
no longer motivated to be a designer for hire but to be the one calling the shots—the
designer as CEO. As he wrote in a blog post called “The End of Client Services” just this past July, “I came to the conclusion that if I wanted to design great
user experiences then that old model of being a design contractor or a studio
or an agency would not work. Instead, it’s necessary to be a part of the
company that owns the product, to be in a position where I can continually work
on and improve the product without the artificial constraints of a services
contract… [And why] join a company when you can be the company?”
Lascaux Co. is that company, which Vinh founded with his partner Scott Ostler (creator of
dump.fm, a real-time visual chatroom), and Mixel is their first product. Mixel is
an iPad application that turns the usually private act of art making into a social experience. By
art they mean digital collages—called mixels in the app’s parlance—that are crafted from images users pull in from the web, their own iPad or the Mixel library, which is populated by everything that other Mixel users have posted. Having spent a little time with the app (thanks to a loaner iPad provided by Vinh), I can attest to how quick it is to learn, how fun it can be to make “artwork” and how easy it is to get hooked on the prospect of having your mixels “liked” (in Mixel your collages can even be “loved”—users can select five mixels a week to bestow with this honor). In the days leading up to Mixel’s launch I met with Vinh for a demonstration and answers to a few questions.
How did you decide to
Vinh: When I left my job last year, I figured
I was going to join somebody else’s start-up or start one of my own. So I
started developing this idea and hired an engineer to build a prototype for me,
and it was actually very different. I used the prototype to gauge the interest
of investors, potential partners and users. And then I got enough positive
feedback that I thought, OK, I’m really going to do this. Then I started
looking for a technical co-founder, someone who could actually build it. And I met
Scott [Ostler] at the end of last year and we formed a company in February and
we started coding in March. Over the summer we raised a seed round of venture
capital, and that kept us going for a while. [Lascaux has raised $700,000 to date.]
Vinh: We started out thinking of painting and
drawing, and what we found was that drawing a line is very personal and people
find it very personally risky, they feel like, I’m being judged on whether or
not I can draw a circle, and nobody can draw a circle, right? So everyone feels
insecure about it. We had to create a way for them to express themselves
visually without making them undertake the scary task of rendering something,
so that’s why there’s no painting or drawing tools in here. There might be at
some point. We have some ideas about how to make painting and drawing tools
that still feel really easy and democratic but mostly as an embellishment to
the collage. We might at some point add sound or multimedia or animations, so
you could collage animations—that would be phenomenal.
We also have no text tool. A lot of
designers ask for that. But what we saw was that when you’re able to
communicate with typing in text, then people stop thinking in a visual mode and
they start thinking in a captioning mode. Like, they get a picture and they
come up with something funny to enhance that picture. We want to ignite the
circuits in your brain that center around visual creativity and visual
communication, so we left out text tools. People are finding text and cropping
it out and assembling stuff, and I think that’s fine, it’s still a different
part of your brain. It’s not so easy to come up with something, people riff on
other works in there because that’s what’s available to them. But the majority [of
mixels] do not have text.
What materials can you use to
Vinh: You can search for any image on the
web [the image search engine is Bing]. Because you’re authenticated with Facebook,
you can grab all your Facebook photos. If you have photos on your iPad, you can
grab any of those photos. You can use multi-touch gestures to manipulate [any
image], it’s super responsive and fast. Layer things, flip them, duplicate
them, crop them, use your finger to draw whatever crop you want. Part of what
we’re doing is, the crop tool is actually very primitive. I think we’ve always
wanted to improve it but what we’ve found is it’s actually quite liberating
because people feel like, well, nobody’s going to be able to do it perfectly,
so I don’t have to get a perfect crop. We want a very easy, casual environment.
So, it takes no time at all to create something fun.
The secret sauce is that every image
you add to the canvas is actually getting uploaded to the server, and the
server is keeping the original copy, even though you’re cropping and
manipulating it. It creates this framework of what we like to call
object-oriented art. So you can actually sort of touch the art the way you
can’t on a photo-sharing site, where everything is a flat JPEG. You can open up
any one of these [images on Mixel], tap it to explore it, and you can see it’s
not a flat JPEG, it’s just a series of database calls. So these are objects.
This is made by David [taps on one user’s examples] so you can’t make any
permanent changes to it, but you can sort of poke around and see how it’s put
together. You can move stuff around. Even David can’t change it because he’s
posted it publicly.
Can friends create a mixel together?
Vinh: It’s not really collaborative in that
way. It’s like you create something and then you post it. But it is social in
that you really have a sense, because these are just database objects, the
server knows every time it shows up in a collage and it can tell you that. So
you tap on this strawberry and it says that this piece is used in 32 other
mixels. You can tap on “view uses” and you get thumbnails of every collage in
the system that’s using this strawberry.
We’re trying to engender visual chatter.
We want people to think of art not as something that has to be so expertly done
and formal that it’s suitable for hanging on a wall, but to think of it much
more conversationally and social and casual. It’s a conversation that anyone
can jump in. So even if this was done by the most expert collage artist,
anybody could go in here, pick it apart, see how it was done, learn from it,
remix and basically talk back to the artist, give them their own take on it.
What about copyright
on source images?
Vinh: There will definitely be some people
that complain, that’s for sure. But we think we have a pretty good fair-use
argument. If you look at Tumblr or Posterous or these other sites, they’re
violating copyright on a mass scale. The works are not altered in any way.
People are just pulling these works in, irrespective of the original copyright
holders’ wishes. People in Mixel are actually creating derivative works, new
works, and adding value to it. Because it’s not just reproducing what’s done,
it’s using it for a new purpose. Sometimes satirical, sometimes for comedy,
sometimes just for artistic expression. But we will comply with the DMCA,
so we will take down anything… But this is really a case of, you have to do it,
try it, and ask for forgiveness later, otherwise it would never get out there.
It’s also more private than a website
like Flickr that anybody can get to, even a search engine. Here you have to
have the app. There’s not one view that shows you everything. And the sharing
page is somewhat private too, it doesn’t give you access to the whole network.
It’s a bit less public.
Is there a way to retain and display information
about the source for each image?
Vinh: We’re collecting that on a server, but
we’re not serving that back to the user, not in the interface. I think we will
at some point…
Part of the beauty of this is, when you
tap on one of these things, it’s not a flat JPEG like on a file sharing site,
so you can tap on something and maybe get a little pop-up that shows you meta
information like where it came from, maybe a link back to that site or maybe a
little piece of marketing or advertising “get a deal” on this or that. Every
collage becomes a potential foundation for a lot of interactions. So if you’re
promoting a Captain America movie, when you tap on this you might get a link to
a movie site or discount movie tickets. Let’s say, fast forward to the
holidays, and now they’re promoting the Captain America DVD, and we can go back
retroactively repurpose this real estate, so to speak. There are a lot of ideas
around the meta information that we could do. If it’s a movie or for a brand,
we have ideas for creating these brand-safe arenas within the network, so that
everything that goes in there can be moderated and approved, and the brand can
see how people mixed stuff up and made something new out of it. That’s for a
little bit further down the road. First we have to amass a big audience with
just the core tools and teach them this new activity.
What will you charge for the app?
Vinh: It’s free. Nobody’s really sitting
around saying, I’m really looking for a social collage app. We could get a
decent number of people to pay $.99 or $1.99 for it, but that’s just not a big
enough business for us and for our investors. The opportunity is much bigger.
We think it’s a digital photography-sized opportunity. The impulse to snap a
picture goes back 150 years, maybe, but the impulse to express yourself
visually in some way, and collage is just a technique for that, that goes back
to cave paintings, even. So we think everybody out there starts out doing this
kind of thing as a kid, and the reason they stop, I mean some of them generally
don’t enjoy it, but I think a lot of people stop because society says, you’re
not good that, you should stop embarrassing yourself. So they basically lose
the social context that encourages them to be doing it. So we think this can
bring that context that makes it really fun and rewarding and low risk. We
think we can turn a huge number of non-artists into casual collage artists, and
we can build a huge audience that way. And we have a number of different ways
that we think can monetize that audience. So that’s why it has to be free.
Because somebody’s going to do it, if it’s not us, somebody’s going to turn the
iPad into this incredibly democratic, incredibly popular art-making tool,
combine art and social on the iPad and build up a huge audience for it. It’s
sort of like one of these inevitable things. We want to be that company.
Mixel is available for free in the App Store, and a Facebook account is required to join. For more background on Mixel, see Khoi’s introduction on his blog.
Ed note: Two corrections were made to this article post-publication. The first, we originally stated that Lascaux raised $700,000 in venture capital this week; that is actually the amount of funding raised to date. And second, the image search engine was originally stated as Google Images, but it is Bing.
Update: Mixel posted a FAQ page about its Facebook log-in requirement.
Sue Apfelbaum is a freelance writer and editor with a focus on design, art, music, film and culture. From 2006 to 2012 Sue was the editorial director for AIGA, publishing critical, inspirational and educational content about design on the AIGA website and
developing programming for AIGA's webinars. Visit http://about.me/sueapfelbaum
Stefan Bucher, whose Daily Monster inkblot creations have been connecting with web audiences for the past five years, now has an iPhone and iPad app. And it’s spooky good fun.
Section: Inspiration -
interview, Voice, interaction design, entertainment, digital media, students
In the fourth webinar in AIGA and Adobe's "Breakthroughs" series, Callie Neylan led a discussion with Lindsay Powell of National Geographic and Colin Fleming of Adobe about how to create new storytelling experiences on the iPad.
Section: Inspiration -
editorial design, interaction design, ux design, students
Want to quit your job to play all day? When you play games with clients, you can have it both ways. Luke Hohmann reveals how to break free of habits and have fun innovating.
Section: Inspiration -
interview, Voice, design thinking, user research
What are the possibilities for books beyond print? Willis explores a new chapter (or six) in web-based publishing.
The week's best design stories (and general musings) to see you through the weekend.
Section: Inspiration -
advertising, photography, book design
In 1964, Saul Bass hired me as a strategic logo design planner, account
manager, and director of new business contacts. I was young, just a few
of UCLA, and I was attracted to Saul's rational approach to great
logo design in the ‘60s. Saul was captivating as he described his
reasoning why his great
designs worked: thoughtful planning first, design next. Then it all
came together which I call credibility-based logo design. This new
resulting process happened one night in Saul's office.
Enter your work for the chance to be an It's Nice That Graduate of 2015!
Posted by It's Nice That
16 hours ago from
It's Nice That
Cascades 2008 Report on Sustainable Development
AMA in the AM: You Are Only As Good As Your Data – Lessons From the Big Data Guys
May 01, 2015
UX Architect at LaneTerralever
April 20, 2015